A few more abnormalities:
1.) House intel committee rules - 9.4
Each member of the committee
shall at all times have access to all papers and other material received from any source.
How come no one but Adam Schiff and his staffers had access to the material or source?
Why didn't he share it? Was it all preplanned?
Something is wrong here.
2.) The "whistle blower" was suppose to go to the IC IG directly, not to Adan Schiff.
(ii) The employee may contact the intel committees directly as described in clause (i) only if the employee--
- (I) before making such contact, furnishes to the Director, through the Inspector General, a statement of the employee's complaint, or information and notice of the employee's intent to contact the intel committees directly; and
- (II) obtains and follows from the Director, through the Inspector General, dierction how to contact the intel committees, in accordance with appropriate security procedures.
Did they do that?
No! No they didn't
Lets go down the preplanned timeline:
Schiff lied
Schiff lied about working with the "whistle blower"
Schiff lied about when contact was made
They broke the rule to go through the IC IG first
They forwarded a complaint, based on an UREGENT complaint, who didn't even read the call transcripts at all
The complaint about the call was all 2nd hand hearsay, even though they checked the box "First Hand"
The form changed after the complaint was initially filed
Has this ever happened in the past?
We never had a Donald Trump in the past.