Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2019, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Port Charlotte, FL - Dallas, PA
5,176 posts, read 4,951,032 times
Reputation: 5094

Advertisements

When Elizabeth Warren was recently asked how she would respond to an Evangelical supporter who believes marriage is between one man and one woman, her reply was baffling. She stated, "I’m going to assume it’s a guy who said that, and I’m just going to say: then just marry one woman."
Why would she assume that only "guys" believe in traditional marriage? I guess I missed the news flash that women no longer support marriage between a man and woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:28 PM
 
3,372 posts, read 1,567,820 times
Reputation: 4597
That sounds pretty sexist of her. I'm pretty sure many men in this SJW-era have been taken to task for "assuming" things about women. But then again the SJW crowd is filled with blatant hypocrites and straight-man haters.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:30 PM
 
3,372 posts, read 1,567,820 times
Reputation: 4597
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikMal View Post
Why would she assume that only "guys" believe in traditional marriage? I guess I missed the news flash that women no longer support marriage between a man and woman.
Great Warrior Warren's brand of SJW women supporters hate men. Especially straight white male conservative men. If they could eradicate these types of men they would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,535 posts, read 6,171,323 times
Reputation: 6575
It was a joke.

You remember jokes right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:34 PM
 
6,617 posts, read 5,014,844 times
Reputation: 3689
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikMal View Post
When Elizabeth Warren was recently asked how she would respond to an Evangelical supporter who believes marriage is between one man and one woman, her reply was baffling. She stated, "I’m going to assume it’s a guy who said that, and I’m just going to say: then just marry one woman."
Why would she assume that only "guys" believe in traditional marriage? I guess I missed the news flash that women no longer support marriage between a man and woman.
Because for the purpose of the bit she had to pick one or the other thats why she says "I am going to assume..." as opposed to "I assume its a guy". You support marriage between a man and woman, and a man and man, woman and woman. Its not a zero sum game, you wont run out of support or support one less than the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:36 PM
 
4,336 posts, read 1,556,840 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
It was a joke.

You remember jokes right?
She (and her supporters) are the joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,535 posts, read 6,171,323 times
Reputation: 6575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open-D View Post
She (and her supporters) are the joke.

Great comeback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:47 PM
 
3,372 posts, read 1,567,820 times
Reputation: 4597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
It was a joke.

You remember jokes right?
So guys (is that term legal anymore?) who get accused of sexism for "jokes" in the workplace should be immune too, right? You know, they are just "jokes." Typical hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,838,473 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikMal View Post
When Elizabeth Warren was recently asked how she would respond to an Evangelical supporter who believes marriage is between one man and one woman, her reply was baffling. She stated, "I’m going to assume it’s a guy who said that, and I’m just going to say: then just marry one woman."
Why would she assume that only "guys" believe in traditional marriage? I guess I missed the news flash that women no longer support marriage between a man and woman.



I took at as sarcasm. It seemed like the man who asked the question was really asking for himself, but framed it as "asking for a friend"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:53 PM
 
3,372 posts, read 1,567,820 times
Reputation: 4597
Remember men, when women make a sexist joke about men it is just a harmless joke and sarcasm. But when men make a sexist joke about women, well then it is #metoo time and also time to get sued and fired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top