Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2023, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,302,617 times
Reputation: 27863

Advertisements

Pathetic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2023, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,880 posts, read 25,195,050 times
Reputation: 19110
And was beat by 6,000, so finished midpack as a woman or man. Non-competitive age grouper, really who cares aside from the transphobics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2023, 10:17 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,239,607 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
And was beat by 6,000, so finished midpack as a woman or man. Non-competitive age grouper, really who cares aside from the transphobics.
Funny how you equate thinking men shouldn’t be competing in women’s sports equals being transphobic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2023, 10:21 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,880 posts, read 25,195,050 times
Reputation: 19110
Operative word being competing. Non-competitive age groupers aren't competing with anyone but themselves, so again, can't see why anyone would care about it other than they are transphobic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2023, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,239,607 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
Operative word being competing. Non-competitive age groupers aren't competing with anyone but themselves, so again, can't see why anyone would care about it other than they are transphobic.
You can’t see anything other than your narrative than to label people transphobic, and men certainly are competing in women sports, unless you’re saying this is fake news, and it’s just one example…and in regards to forgetting to sign up for the non-binary position, not buying it…and there’s certainly women not happy about competing against men due to an unfair advantage. Are you calling them transphobic also?

Penn’s Lia Thomas becomes first transgender woman to win NCAA swimming championship
https://whyy.org/articles/lia-thomas...ship-penn/amp/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2023, 10:50 PM
 
Location: The 719
18,039 posts, read 27,494,229 times
Reputation: 17358
Quote:
Originally Posted by VikingsToValhalla View Post
Yep, it was a transwoman.

Trans runner beat 14K women in London Marathon after running NYC as a man | New York Post


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Agz-vTRx2LE

https://nypost.com/2023/04/25/trans-...ndon-marathon/


Are those 14,000 women okay with getting beat by a man who started identifying as a woman just a few weeks ago? I think it would be comical if more male athletes did this just to prove a point on how idiotic this whole trans thing is.
Men Rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2023, 11:49 PM
 
1,964 posts, read 705,992 times
Reputation: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
I see all the resident righties didn't notice that this trans person came in 6160th among the women. He/she still has work to do before you guys take pride in him/her.

Uh, the headline on the OP is completely bogus. Dude/ess didn't "win" the London Marathon.

Other things of note about the London Marathon.

First woman came in 20th overall. There were 42K runners. 22K men and 20K women.

The race had a non binary section... 88 people participated. The reason the female runner complained is that the one trans dude you all are so "proud of" didn't sign up for the non binary division and instead ran as a woman.

The more reasonable people have been requesting that they have non binary teams/divisions etc. This trans didn't comply. Ran as a woman. Ya'll usually don't go for that.
what is your point? Why did she need to sign up for the non-binary? SHE IDENTIFIED AS A WOMAN, NOT NON-BINARY. The female runner who complained is transphobic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2023, 12:35 AM
 
29,527 posts, read 22,704,392 times
Reputation: 48250
I nearly lost my lunch looking at the video preview pic.

Dude definitely does not look like a lady.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2023, 12:56 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,079 posts, read 44,906,239 times
Reputation: 13724
Quote:
Originally Posted by VikingsToValhalla View Post
Yep, it was a transwoman.

Trans runner beat 14K women in London Marathon after running NYC as a man | New York Post

https://nypost.com/2023/04/25/trans-...ndon-marathon/

Are those 14,000 women okay with getting beat by a man who started identifying as a woman just a few weeks ago? I think it would be comical if more male athletes did this just to prove a point on how idiotic this whole trans thing is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZiM4AMJkzc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2023, 02:08 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
27,219 posts, read 13,508,926 times
Reputation: 19576
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
I see all the resident righties didn't notice that this trans person came in 6160th among the women. He/she still has work to do before you guys take pride in him/her.

Uh, the headline on the OP is completely bogus. Dude/ess didn't "win" the London Marathon.

Other things of note about the London Marathon.

First woman came in 20th overall. There were 42K runners. 22K men and 20K women.

The race had a non binary section... 88 people participated. The reason the female runner complained is that the one trans dude you all are so "proud of" didn't sign up for the non binary division and instead ran as a woman.

The more reasonable people have been requesting that they have non binary teams/divisions etc. This trans didn't comply. Ran as a woman. Ya'll usually don't go for that.
TBH - no one real checks your sex in terms of such events, however the trans runner was not a biological female and as such should BE excluded from the female category.

Whilst trans individuals can identify as a man or woman, they can not change their actual sex related to male and female, and in terms of not identifying properly this could be deemed misrepresentation.

I am sure the athletics authorities in Britain, who often take a different view to their US counterparts, will be looking to close at closing any such loopholes in relation to entry standards.

Trans athlete defends decision to run in female category at London Marathon after being accused of 'exploiting loophole' - LBC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top