Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In Main Street media, Newsweek and other liberal outlets, they describe the democrats latest scheme of removing over a hundred GOP from ballots because democrats know they can’t win on an open borders, tanking economy and extremely low approval ratings. Legitimate elections may be a thing of the past.
Why can’t democrats try legitimate political campaigns instead of trying to cheat or violate laws?
What's next for democrats? Dictatorships? We need to accept better from democrats?
Last edited by johnsonkk; 01-06-2024 at 06:46 AM..
Reason: Democrats like ballot stuffing but it’s illegal
In Main Street media, Newsweek and other liberal outlets, they describe the democrats latest scheme of removing over a hundred GOP from ballots because democrats know they can’t win on an open borders, tanking economy and extremely low approval ratings. Legitimate elections may be a thing of the past.
Why can’t democrats try legitimate political campaigns instead of trying to cheat or violate laws?
What's next for democrats? Dictatorships? We need to accept better from democrats?
What a bunch of idiots.
Again, for the short bus riders... states, state officials, and state courts have NO jurisdiction whatsoever on this issue. The 14th Amendment specifically vests jurisdiction in regards to 14th Amendment ineligibility in Congress. See the 14th Amendment's Section 5.
List times it was implemented. Also the option to be requalified has to be passed through Congress or a POTUS amnesty.
Those in the House who supported the insurrection may have a problem.
The. That would be Pelosi. She willfully rejected requests to increase security in Congress. She also allow Capitol Police to softly respond to mostly peaceful protestors while ignoring federal or democrat involvement.
The. That would be Pelosi. She willfully rejected requests to increase security in Congress. She also allow Capitol Police to softly respond to mostly peaceful protestors while ignoring federal or democrat involvement.
You are mistaken. I suggest you read my previous post.
Hmmm, seems to me I remember the democrats doing the exact same thing when Trump was elected in 2016 as well as pretty much every time a republican got elected. Once again, rules for thee but not for me.
You are mistaken. I suggest you read my previous post.
So you support barring 125 Republicans from Congress as a political stunt. We understand. That’s the point of democrats to spin a narrative to remove qualified candidates off the ticket so democrats can waltz in and run unopposed.
So you support barring 125 Republicans from Congress as a political stunt. We understand. That’s the point of democrats to spin a narrative to remove qualified candidates off the ticket so democrats can waltz in and run unopposed.
It is what it is. No conviction needed. If they did not follow their oath to support and defend the Constitution and supported Trumps actions, they may have created their own problem.
Can be determined at state Supreme court. This article shows the times of implication of 14th Sec3. :
Part of me says this is just some partisan gamesmanship, after all this is a big election year. On the other hand I see a disturbing trend where leftists feel empowered to completely abandon due process and laws, and thereby create political chaos. They accused Trump supporters of insurrection, while they are essentially doing the same thing in multiple venues.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.