Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2008, 08:24 AM
 
19,922 posts, read 11,045,204 times
Reputation: 27395

Advertisements

The answer is DAVID RICE ATCHISON

President James Knox Polk was scheduled to step down from office at noon on Sunday, March 4, 1849. It seems that President-elect Zachary Taylor was a religious man and refused to be sworn in on a Sunday. It was the Sabbath. Taylor insisted on waited until the following day.

The big question arose: Who was going to serve as the President during this twenty-four hour period? Normally, the Vice-President (George M. Dallas at the time) would fill the position, but his term expired along with Polk's. Dallas had actually resigned as President of the Senate on Friday, March 2nd.

Under the law, the Presidency then fell to the President Pro Tem of the Senate - David Rice Atchison! Atchison had just been elected for an additional term to this office during the closing hours of the Thirtieth Congress. As a result, Atchison legally became the President for a twenty-four hour period, even though he was never elected to this office or sworn in.

He served for one day with no scandals, no spin, no opposition, no war, no conflict with another nation and no problems. That would make David Rice Atchison the greatest President in US History.

Charley
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2008, 08:32 AM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,608 posts, read 21,396,904 times
Reputation: 10111
true about "for their time".But in some sense they were able to look to the future also.

While change as far as equal rights didn't happen overnight for everybody after the revolution the way the words were written and the government installed it set in motion for all.

Regarding Washington and his denying himself the spoils of war that was common for war heros to take back then.

He was a ambitious man,yet put his needs below the good of the nation in many regards.To bad many today are the opposite of this and are more interested in getting rich or gaining power even if its at the expense of the nation.

Some people,politicians and global corporations or even American companies hold allegiance to their shareholders and have no allegiance or loyality to their nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2008, 09:12 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,334,196 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
Washington.


The man was so popular and idoilized that many were ready to make him king.He rejected that and because of his willingness to put America above his ambition we have the choice of electing leaders today.

He was also important in preventing the revolution from imploding after it was won,and was instrumental in winning it also.

He was actually a ambitious man and wanted to be considered equal in British circles but the Brits kinda looked down on him being a colonist and luckily he fought on our side.Had he been more accepted by the Brits he may have fought against the colonists.
Yup.

I've always considered Washingtons' willingness to step aside as the strongest evidence of his greatness.

Consider just how RARE (and almost unheard of until Washington did it) it is for a military commander who has total control of the entire military to actually step aside and give up his power to a civilian government.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2008, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,852,058 times
Reputation: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMTAD View Post
The answer is DAVID RICE ATCHISON

President James Knox Polk was scheduled to step down from office at noon on Sunday, March 4, 1849. It seems that President-elect Zachary Taylor was a religious man and refused to be sworn in on a Sunday. It was the Sabbath. Taylor insisted on waited until the following day.

The big question arose: Who was going to serve as the President during this twenty-four hour period? Normally, the Vice-President (George M. Dallas at the time) would fill the position, but his term expired along with Polk's. Dallas had actually resigned as President of the Senate on Friday, March 2nd.

Under the law, the Presidency then fell to the President Pro Tem of the Senate - David Rice Atchison! Atchison had just been elected for an additional term to this office during the closing hours of the Thirtieth Congress. As a result, Atchison legally became the President for a twenty-four hour period, even though he was never elected to this office or sworn in.

He served for one day with no scandals, no spin, no opposition, no war, no conflict with another nation and no problems. That would make David Rice Atchison the greatest President in US History.

Charley
what about william henry harrison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2008, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,334,415 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarquise View Post
what about william henry harrison?
Tippecanoe and ah-ah-CHOO!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2008, 11:14 AM
 
3,859 posts, read 10,329,701 times
Reputation: 2751
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
true about "for their time".But in some sense they were able to look to the future also.

While change as far as equal rights didn't happen overnight for everybody after the revolution the way the words were written and the government installed it set in motion for all.

Regarding Washington and his denying himself the spoils of war that was common for war heros to take back then.

He was a ambitious man,yet put his needs below the good of the nation in many regards.To bad many today are the opposite of this and are more interested in getting rich or gaining power even if its at the expense of the nation.

Some people,politicians and global corporations or even American companies hold allegiance to their shareholders and have no allegiance or loyality to their nation.


Great post-especially your last sentence!

Nicolem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top