domergurl wrote;
Quote:
but people have swiss bank accounts for reasons
|
Nothing wrong with "having" offshore accounts. However it is a CRIME to not disclose same. Therefor abetting someone for that non-disclosure is also a crime. UBS officers who did that are (although not yet convicted) guilty of a crime.
The conundrum is that Swiss law makes it illegal for the bank to disclose the names of account holder. Swiss law is however pretty stiff on its bankers who ABET OTHERS IN BREAKING BANKING LAWS.
On a side note, in 2001 an agreement reached between the US and UBS, UBS promised to stop doing what they had been caught doing. However they refused to disclose to the DOJ the results of an internal audit!
I'm pretty sure that the Swiss government, seeing UBS's assets in the US seized might discover an "accomodating" way to get enough "disclosing information", but not the names released to the DOJ.
BTW, some estimates of this activity estimate that it costs the US Treasury (that is you and me) $100 BILLION in lost tax revenue yearly.
Although claiming to be "completely, 100% innocent", Weil has disappeared and is now a fugitive.
golfgod