Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,461,458 times
Reputation: 1052

Advertisements

Contribute online or by US mail:

http://www.thenadyasulemanfamily.com/ (broken link)

You can also leave a comment for her to read.

Remarkable!

BEWARE! This website might be BOGUS. Her actual address is in Whittier, California, not L.A. But this website is referenced in a recent L.A. Times article:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...suleman-t.html

 
Old 02-19-2009, 05:22 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Dr. Phil was asking for donations yesterday on his show (don't know when it was aired in the States)... ridiculous.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,521,305 times
Reputation: 21679
I'm glad to hear the United States moving AWAY from the rightwing ideology of nutcases. The Bush Admin. was the other side of the coin, Ahmedinijad was on the other side (or maybe Bin Laden), all of them are extremist nutjobs.

Time for reality to replace ideology/religion/Republican inspired slavery
 
Old 02-26-2009, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Nome
2,397 posts, read 4,702,223 times
Reputation: 477
Well she is looking at doing porn now as a way to make money.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 05:55 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,171,415 times
Reputation: 32726
First of all, it is speculation to say she's shopping for a million dollar home. That was reported last week and it turned out she was just doing an interview in it. Second of all, shouldn't we all be happy if some private party is offering some financial support because that means it won't be on the tax payers. If someone is going to buy her a house, or give her money to buy a house, is that really a bad thing? Does she "deserve" it? No. But if the tax payers don't have to support them all, then who cares what she does?
 
Old 02-26-2009, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Nome
2,397 posts, read 4,702,223 times
Reputation: 477
I don't give a RA what she does really. They should put those children up for adoption in California.
 
Old 02-27-2009, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Why would it be disgraceful to prevent people like you and your ilk from using the pictures for your anti-war, anti-military, anti-US political agenda?

Quote:
One organization, Military Families United, said a survey of military families found that 84% opposed changing the policy.

"We are pretty disappointed in the president's decision to overturn the ban," said John Ellsworth, the group's president, whose son was killed in Iraq in 2004. "This is a complete disregard for the will of America's military families and their need for privacy during this solemn moment."
Quote:
But photographic images have been prohibited since 1991.
I wonder why Clinton didn't lift the ban?
 
Old 02-27-2009, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Glad to see our brave get the recognition, that they are no longer considered to be no-name, nobody arriving home for the final time. It would give me an opportunity to salute them, instead them being brought in in complete darkness.

Glad to see this happen.
 
Old 02-27-2009, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Oh, yes, by all means, we should place your wants/needs/political agenda over the wishes of the families.

Typical liberal mentality.
 
Old 02-27-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,431,660 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh, yes, by all means, we should place your wants/needs/political agenda over the wishes of the families.

Typical liberal mentality.

Bush could of cared less about the families...if he had he wouldn't have sent thier sons and daughters off to fight and die in a meaningless war searching for some fictitious WMDs.

The only thing he worried about was public support for his murderous scheme....as photos of the dead would have surely brought pressure to bear on himself, Cheney and the rest of the adminstration's war criminals.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top