Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2009, 01:15 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,025,682 times
Reputation: 36027

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
^^
It is quite funny how people complain about eminent domain for rail but are perfectly fine to destroy cities in the name of progress for highways. I grew up near Detroit and wonderful neighborhoods were destroyed so interstates could split the city and usher all the wealth out to the suburbs.

It's fine to oppose government proposals, but it's just odd how hypocritical people tend to be in supporting massive government highway projects but not rail.
Those people are content in riding their vehicles never giving a second thought as to the property owners who lost their homes to expand the highways they use everyday! Hypocrits indeed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2009, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Seattle
500 posts, read 910,374 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver View Post
Oh yea another heavily subsidised government boondoggle!!
Lets hope it's so successful that it hurts the airlines enough that they need even more subsidies.
Can you say circle jerk?
Airlines are in trouble, economy is bad and people can't fly.
We need jobs, build rail, that will create jobs, could even save Detroit if we build the trains their.
Rail can't get you everywhere but it is cheap, many people will ride.
Finally try and catch up to what every other industrialized nation in the world has.
Can you comprehend?
One must speak to republicans as if they're children or foreigners.
Keep it very basic.
Heavily subsidized government boondoggle, like the military?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 01:38 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,709,999 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by msconnie73 View Post
Those people are content in riding their vehicles never giving a second thought as to the property owners who lost their homes to expand the highways they use everyday! Hypocrits indeed!
Yeah - there's this myth that has inflicted our country that the automobile lifestyle somehow represents the free market and any lifestyle with zoning or transit is "socialism".

In reality, it took MASSIVE government planning, undermining of existing infrastructure, and investment to build suburbia. It couldn't have happened without government, in fact.

Just think of all the sewage, roads, electricity, water, and other infrastructure that has to be built by tax dollars to support subdivisions out in the exurban fringe. It's a huge public works project!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Thumb of Michigan
4,494 posts, read 7,483,325 times
Reputation: 2541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
1. If you look at that map, this isn't building a cross-country rail system. It's intelligently focusing on regions - Florida, Southeast, Gulf Coast, Northeast, Great Lakes, Northwest, Southwest. So, this plan would not try to compete with airplanes. In fact, the reason rail is so successful in the Northeast is because it is more efficient and faster to travel rail than regional commuter planes - city center to city center, no security, no hour waiting. I thought it was obvious that economic development would be included with culture and recreation when I made that statement. Just look at DC and the massive development around subway stops.
Not to mention the Northeast has a high ratio of population to land-mass in the U.S. There would be more emphasis along the Atlantic Seaboard.

I think that's partly the reason why there's a regional plans for high-speed rail due to our low population to land-mass through-out the country.

I'll take anything when it comes to high-speed rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 06:01 PM
 
26,218 posts, read 49,060,172 times
Reputation: 31791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Grass Fever View Post
Not to mention the Northeast has a high ratio of population to land-mass in the U.S. There would be more emphasis along the Atlantic Seaboard.

I think that's partly the reason why there's a regional plans for high-speed rail due to our low population to land-mass through-out the country.

I'll take anything when it comes to high-speed rail.
The map is more a picture of "corridors" than it is regions, but I'm nitpicking. Rail makes sense in densely populated corridors like the Northeast Corridor, but we have many other corridors. We need lots of high speed rail, and not just for passengers. It would great to get truckloads of fresh produce sent by rail, overnight from FL to NYC. No reason it can't be done, just take willpower, muscle and money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Denver
9,963 posts, read 18,503,523 times
Reputation: 6181
This would be the best money ever spent, jobs would be created, R&D would explode, city centers would flourish, it would be amazing.

We can spec the unused car factories to build our trains..re-train auto makers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,224,933 times
Reputation: 7373
Interesting different view on the subject, and kind of supports the view that a legitimate business case needs to be made before making this kind of financial commitment:

Bullet trains would make commuting to and from places like Fresno, Modesto and Bakersfield easier. But wouldn't that merely encourage the sort of sprawl that we are supposed to be discouraging?

California certainly needs to upgrade its long-neglected, deteriorating highway system and probably expand commuter transit service. But bullet trains may be a romantic solution in search of a problem.



Dan Walters: Does California really need a bullet train? - Sacramento Politics - California Politics | Sacramento Bee (http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/823367.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
I'm looking forward to it. The transportation network is a strategic asset. The transportation infrastructure should be diversified and multi-modal so that there is not an over-reliance on the personal automobile and aircraft. 9/11 led to the momentary shut down of all air traffic and as the car is not a practical alternative for distances over several hundred miles (unless you're on vacation) the nation was 'immobile' for a day or two. Adding high speed trains adds another 'leg' to the nation's mobility options. If Europe and Japan can do it, we can, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,224,933 times
Reputation: 7373
I'd like to see the fares that would need to be charged to make it operationally self sufficient.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
I'd like to see the fares that would need to be charged to make it operationally self sufficient.
I think it would be fair if the cost of a trip on a high speed train was similar to a trip on a plane over the same distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top