Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:01 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,584,176 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Really how do you know Cheney is [MOD CUT/inappropriate language] ?
Well we know that one doesn't apply to Clinton.

Last edited by Ibginnie; 03-14-2009 at 07:33 AM.. Reason: edited quoted post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:03 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,584,176 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Yeah, I knew that was coming. If Clinton had anything to do with any of it, he should be brought to justice. How does another's crimes exonerate Bush and Vampire Dickless Cheney?
It doesn't. My guess is that there are a lot of politcal opponents making accusations. If either of them are guilty of any of the things on their lists, they should go to prison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:06 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Raggy dee Ann

Yup, that's the standard approach:

1) Choose a death
2) Stick in just enough information to make it look suspicious (often this actually involves invoking the word "suspicious")
3) Leave out critical information that would put the death in a much different light
4) Over emphasize personal connections that are actually pretty minor

Voila!
You have a "mysterious" connection to a "mysterious" death.
It's MAGIC!
But PLENTY of ignorant people will believe it because it reinforces their preconceptions.

Ken
Aw, c'mon, Ken, have you read the entire Mike Connel situation?

It's totally naive to believe that people aren't killed for/in politics. it happens all the time all over the world....do you REALLY think NO American would ever do such a thing??:ro lleyes:


They do. And the perpetrators love it when the allegations are all dismissed as a "whacko conspiracy theories".....isn't that convenient?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:09 AM
 
Location: in purgurtory in London
3,722 posts, read 4,309,424 times
Reputation: 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Raggy dee Ann

Yup, that's the standard approach:

1) Choose a death
2) Stick in just enough information to make it look suspicious (often this actually involves invoking the word "suspicious")
3) Leave out critical information that would put the death in a much different light
4) Over emphasize personal connections that are actually pretty minor

Voila!
You have a "mysterious" connection to a "mysterious" death.
It's MAGIC!
But PLENTY of ignorant people will believe it because it reinforces their preconceptions.

Ken

There are one or two I question especially in the Bush camp, but yes all people just pick their mysterious deaths and run with it. I do wonder about Gary Webb though. Another one that was definatly suicide is Deborah Palfrey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:11 AM
 
Location: in purgurtory in London
3,722 posts, read 4,309,424 times
Reputation: 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Aw, c'mon, Ken, have you read the entire Mike Connel situation?

It's totally naive to believe that people aren't killed for/in politics. it happens all the time all over the world....do you REALLY think NO American would ever do such a thing??:ro lleyes:


They do. And the perpetrators love it when the allegations are all dismissed as a "whacko conspiracy theories".....isn't that convenient?
I knew some of the players in the Bunch case and that was definately a suicide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:15 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raggy dee Ann View Post
I knew some of the players in the Bunch case and that was definately a suicide.

Sorry, Raggy, but I have no idea what that has to do with my post....

but


ONE instance is NOT proof that no murders occur......and knowing the players doesn't mean you(or anyone) knows ALL the players.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:27 AM
 
Location: in purgurtory in London
3,722 posts, read 4,309,424 times
Reputation: 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Sorry, Raggy, but I have no idea what that has to do with my post....

but


ONE instance is NOT proof that no murders occur......and knowing the players doesn't mean you(or anyone) knows ALL the players.
I was agreeing with Balfour, whom you quoted and was responding to. I'm not going to go into details, but I do know more about the case than I'd admit to on here. Sorry, but I can't belive ALL the deaths were murders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:50 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,328,298 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Sorry, Raggy, but I have no idea what that has to do with my post....

but


ONE instance is NOT proof that no murders occur......and knowing the players doesn't mean you(or anyone) knows ALL the players.
Of course not, but it does show either:

A) A VERY POOR investigation (on the part of those making the conspiracy claims) into the actual facts of the case - and thus bringing into question just how well (or poorly) the OTHER such cases have been vetted.

OR

B) A deliberate use of information which the authors KNOW to be false - thus calling into question their basic honesty.

If there are cases (or even a single case) which is pretty clearly false, then one or the other (or BOTH) of those is true.

Personally, I suspect that (like the Clinton "Hit List") the more you look into this list to actually verify the data, the more you'll find the cases dropping off because they don't pass muster. The problem is, as with any rumor, no one reading the list takes the time (or in truth has the resources) to actually re-verify the real facts (at most, they'll read some more on the web - usually posted by other folks who have simply bought into the theory but have no real personal insight themselves) - and that's EXACTLY what the folks behind such lists are counting on.

If there was really any truth to it, don't you think some hot shot ambitious prosecutor would be pursuing the overall case?
Come on, use a little common sense.

Ken

Last edited by LordBalfor; 03-13-2009 at 10:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 10:29 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,328,298 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Aw, c'mon, Ken, have you read the entire Mike Connel situation?
No I haven't but clearly you haven't either.
The fact is, ANYONE can make a case for ANYTHING quite easily by simply being selective with the data they choose to select (case in point - Bush's case against Iraq) - and it happens ALL THE TIME on the web.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
It's totally naive to believe that people aren't killed for/in politics. it happens all the time all over the world....do you REALLY think NO American would ever do such a thing??:ro lleyes:


They do. And the perpetrators love it when the allegations are all dismissed as a "whacko conspiracy theories".....isn't that convenient?
Maybe they do, but the fact that it MAY happen in SOME CASES doesn't mean that it DID HAPPEN in THIS CASE.
That's just faulty logic.
"
Like the "Clinton Death List" this thing smells - and sets off my Built-in Automatic Cr*p Detector" like crazy.

Ken

Last edited by LordBalfor; 03-13-2009 at 11:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2009, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,623,038 times
Reputation: 8625
I guess Bush didnt have to worry about silencing Vince Foster eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top