New World Order (Ron Paul, Iran, Iraq, interview)

[LibertyandJusticeforAll]

What do you think this really means for the united states?
Sure enough Gordon Brown called G20 economic crisis the begining of the "new world order". Isnt funny how the stocks went higher and money just came in right after that. The news media is showing pictures of everyone holding he other "Our political leaders" and everything is just right with the world since this decision.

Here are the references to the new world order and many more if you care to look into it. Consirpacy or not it is real, it's really just why is it happening and who is pushing this idealogy. This is ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT people WAKE UP!!!
This is the planned destruction of the United States and the constitution its just a matter of time.

The most recent usage of the phrase came from three sources: former United Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair, United Kingdom Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Henry Kissinger.
Henry Kissinger stated in 1994, "The New World Order cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions. Just like Zishan says."[36] Then on January 5, 2009, when asked on television by CNBC anchors about what he suggests Barack Obama focus on during the current Israeli crises he replied that it is a time to reevaluate American foreign policy and that a, ""he can give new impetus to American foreign policy … I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a ‘new world order’ can be created. It’s a great opportunity. It isn’t such a crisis.""[37]
Former British United Kingdom Prime Minister and current British Middle East envoy Tony Blair stated on 13 November 2000 in his Mansion House Speech that "There is a new world order like it or not"[38]. He used the term in 2001[39], 12 November 2001[40] and 2002[41]. On 7 January 2003 he stated that "... the call was for a new world order. But a new order presumes a new consensus. It presumes a shared agenda and a global partnership to do it."[42]
Current United Kingdom Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on 17 December 2001, stated that "This is not the first time the world has faced this question - so fundamental and far-reaching. In the 1940s, after the greatest of wars, visionaries in America and elsewhere looked ahead to a new world and - in their day and for their times -- built a new world order."[43]
Brown, who called for a "new world order" in a 2008 speech in New Delhi, to reflect the rise of Asia and growing concerns over global warming and finance. Brown said the new world order should incorporate a better representation of "the biggest shift in the balance of economic power in the world in two centuries." He then went on, "To succeed now, the post-war rules of the game and the post-war international institutions -- fit for the Cold War and a world of just 50 states -- must be radically reformed to fit our world of globalisation."[44] He also called for the revamping of post-war global institutions including the World Bank, G8 and International Monetary Fund. Other elements of Brown's formulation include spending £100 million a year on setting up a rapid reaction force to intervene in failed states.[45][46]
He has also used the term on the 14 January 2007[47], 12 March 2007[48], 15 May 2007[49], 20 June 2007[50], 15 April 2008[51], andon the 18 April 2008[52], Brown also used the term in his recent speech at the G20 Summit in London on 02 April 2009
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for a new world order based on new ideas, saying the era of tyranny has come to a dead-end. In an exclusive interview with Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), Ahmadinejad noted that it is time to propose new ideologies for running the world. [53]
Georgian President, Mikhail Saakashvili, has said "it's time to move from words to action because this is not going to go away. This nation is fighting for it's survival, but we are also fighting for world peace and we are also fighting for a Future World Order."[54]
Turkish President,Abdullah Gül , has said "I don't think you can control all the world from one centre, There are big nations. There are huge populations. There is unbelievable economic development in some parts of the world. So what we have to do is, instead of unilateral actions, act all together, make common decisions and have consultations with the world. A new world order, if I can say it, should emerge." [55]
Even on the popular Colbert Report, guest John King (of CNN) mentions Obama’s "New World Order" after Stephen Colbert jokes about the media’s role in getting Obama elected. [56]

[vec101]

At the G-20 meeting, Obama helped broker the Financial Stability Board which will set up regulations and oversee all US (and other) systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets.
There are 19 of them and 1 of us.
They will regulate over us.

Just when Obama is accused of socialism, he's essentially creating world economic governance. This means that the FSB, this newly created board, Financial Stability Board, patterned on the Financial Stability Forum that now exists, headed by an Italian banker, populated largely by the European bank executives, will make the decisions on what standards our own SEC and Federal Reserve board should apply to all firms in the United States of any significant size about executive compensation, market activities, and a whole range of issues that used to be under free enterprise reserved for private decision making. FOXNews.com - Morris: Obama a 'Disaster' at the G20 Summit - Greta Van Susteren | On The Record With Greta

US President Barack Obama, who personally helped broker the deal G20 summit: Global financial crackdown is cost of solving crisis - Telegraph

to extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. FEI Financial Reporting Blog: G-20 Leaders Pledge Action; Financial Stability Board to Replace FSF

The above site lists a lot of the concessions and agreements

[truthseeker2012]

"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government."-- Thomas Paine

[LibertyandJusticeforAll]

Originally Posted by truthseeker2012

"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government."-- Thomas Paine

I couldn't agree more!!

[GregW]

If a New World Order would reduce world wide military spending I would certainly consider it. The United States, for one, has wasted an enormous amount of its wealth on attempting to control and protect the world wide oil monopoly and the client states in the Middle East (principally Saudi Arabia and Israel) from rogue states like Saddam’s Iraq and the Ayatollah’s Iran.

If we could have some order able to stomp on the various tyrannies, oppressors’ and pirates, I think it would be a great improvement over settling international differences, as Ambrose Bierce said, with projectiles. Debate beats bullets and nuclear bombs. We may not be able to completely dominate a parliamentary based New World Order but then no single government should be able to dominate a World Order.

I envision a new world government to be a Federated Republic composed of individual states. Each country would relinquish certain powers (like the right to make war) to the World government much like the individual states ceded power to the US Federal government in 1789 when we established the US Constitution. I do not see this limited loss of sovereignty as a major problem.

[Finn_Jarber]

New World Order speech
YouTube - New World Order

[scuba steve]

They need to change their name... New World Order was taken by wrestling a while back. Unless they're planning on having the Hulkinator rule over everyone, anyway.

[LibertyandJusticeforAll]

Originally Posted by GregW

If a New World Order would reduce world wide military spending I would certainly consider it. The United States, for one, has wasted an enormous amount of its wealth on attempting to control and protect the world wide oil monopoly and the client states in the Middle East (principally Saudi Arabia and Israel) from rogue states like Saddam’s Iraq and the Ayatollah’s Iran.

If we could have some order able to stomp on the various tyrannies, oppressors’ and pirates, I think it would be a great improvement over settling international differences, as Ambrose Bierce said, with projectiles. Debate beats bullets and nuclear bombs. We may not be able to completely dominate a parliamentary based New World Order but then no single government should be able to dominate a World Order.

I envision a new world government to be a Federated Republic composed of individual states. Each country would relinquish certain powers (like the right to make war) to the World government much like the individual states ceded power to the US Federal government in 1789 when we established the US Constitution. I do not see this limited loss of sovereignty as a major problem.

LOL that is funny. A new world order is not needed to reduce our spending and close those 700 miltary bases around the world. Just have the people of the united states elect people like Ron Paul and me and we wouldn't have that problem. Even following the constitution would a great idea too. But I think you will see more miltary expanison and those who are "pirates: are problably those who just want freedom and independance. Just like those who didnt want to be apart of the EU would go against the "new order" and they would be deemed bad, evil and would have to be destroyed.
This is all bad news and I can assure it is not to reduce anything other individual rights in each country. You will see mass taxes, carbon foot print and tracking technology in place to KEEP YOU IN LINE!

[GregW]

What makes you certain that I would not become one of the KEEPERS.

[vec101]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

New World Order speech

Guess I should have quit being one of the head-in-the-sand citizens earlier -- I had NO idea Bush Sr. had talked about a New World Order. Well, if I did hear about it - just figured it was about war. La La La La - in LaLa land I guess.