Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is why they should not be treated as a legitimate news organization. The Administration should cancel their press credentials completely.
You mean you prefer those news organizations that manufacture documents against Bush for news and when confronted on it say it doesn't matter if there is evidence out there or not, they simply know it's true.
On the July 2, 2008 edition of Fox and Friends, co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Steve Doocy aired photos of New York Times reporter Jacques Steinberg and Times television editor Steven Reddicliffe that had been crudely doctored, apparently in order to portray the journalists unflatteringly.[67] This occurred during a discussion of a piece in the June 28 edition of The New York Times, which pointed out what Steinberg called "ominous trends" in Fox News' ratings.[68] According to Media Matters, the photos depict New York Times reporter Jacques Steinberg with yellowed teeth, "his nose and chin widened, and his ears made to protrude further". The other image, of Times television editor Steven Reddicliffe, had similar yellow teeth, as well as "dark circles ... under his eyes, and his hairline has been moved back".[69] During the discussion, Doocy called the Times report, written by Steinberg, a "hit piece" ordered up by Reddicliffe.[68] The broadcast then showed an image of Steinberg's face superimposed over a picture of a poodle, while Reddicliffe's face was superimposed over the man holding the poodle's leash.[68] Times culture editor Sam Sifton called the Fox photo work "disgusting," and the criticism of the paper's reporting a "specious and meritless claim" while denying that it was a "hit piece".[68]
Prime example of when it's OK to be a misogynist. Hypocritical liberals.
Anywho, I'd much rather have hot women reading the news than a President guiding America and the world by reading a teleprompter.
BS -when they are doing this quite a bit - it is like Hooters hiring with a single purpose. I noticed you did not comment about the 'editing' FOX has done.
Having said that, MSNBC tends to hire mostly lookers also - but the skirts are generally longer.
...Media Matters For America [has] for a long time, been cataloging "examples of Fox News hosts and correspondents cropping comments by progressives and Democratic political figures in a manner that misrepresents them."
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
This is why they should not be treated as a legitimate news organization. The Administration should cancel their press credentials completely.
"McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years!"
"I can see Russia from my house!"
The hypocrisy isn't just dripping, it's flooding.
Unreal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
