Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No term limits. A major aspect of a Justice's service is that they serve for life. As for age requirements, I believe it's already required that they be a certain age (50, I think) to serve on the court.
I have to say no to term or age limits. SC Justices plan their retirements (if they even decide to retire) dependent upon who will likely be in office at the time they retire (left leaning judges wait to retire until a democrat is in office and vice versa).
I am sorry to see so many people wanting to continue to grant to Justices so much power...
It is undemocratic,almost dictatorial...
The justices are another kind of politicians...
They should be directly elected & certainly face anti-monopoly limitations,such as mandatory retirement & term limits...
The populist anti-monopoly legislation ,concerning companies, exists for...100 years...
Don't we need minor,sensible anti-monopoly legislation for politicians & political persons like Justices..?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
