Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2009, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803

Advertisements

Is 0bama playing politics with inspectors generals? They are politically independent watch dogs for the American people, they are responsible for ensuring that the federal government agencies operate efficiently, effectively and legally.

Quote:
WASHINGTON - -- He was appointed with fanfare as the public watchdog over the government's multi-billion dollar bailout of the nation's financial system. But now Neil Barofsky is embroiled in a dispute with the Obama administration that delayed one recent inquiry and sparked questions about his ability to freely investigate.

The dispute comes as Grassley, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, is looking into the abrupt firings within the last week of two other inspectors general, one of whom was fired by the White House and the other by the chair of the International Trade Commission.

Senator questions firing of 3 inspectors general -- chicagotribune.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2009, 10:44 AM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,640,781 times
Reputation: 2397
Poor guy just wasn't "licking" hard enough. It is a requirement of the Corruptor in Chief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Obama has fired 2 IGs in 2 weeks, leashed another

Quote:
The sudden push to rid the government of independent watchdogs appears to coincide with Barack Obama’s plans to use government spending to get control over more aspects of American life, such as with stimulus spending, the financial sector, and volunteer organizations
Chicago-style politics. Get rid of those IG who will actually do their job looking into waste, fraud and abuse and put in place flunkies and toadies to look the other way.

Incredible.

Quote:
Barofsky ruffled feathers in April when his watchdog report showed that the Obama administration had placed insufficient safeguards on Porkulus spending. This later caused Joe Biden to shrug and tell the media, “Some people are being scammed already,” as if it wasn’t the job of the administration to stop it from happening. Barofsky now has a leash around his neck, with the White House insisting that he answers only to Treasury
Answers only to the Treasury? Isn't that illegal?

Quote:
We are seeing a pattern, no longer just a single data point. IGs work independently to protect taxpayers from corruption and abuse from its own government agencies. A coordinated attack on IGs certainly suggests hostility to that mission, which isn’t the Hope and Change Obama promised on the campaign trail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,941,526 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Is 0bama playing politics with inspectors generals? They are politically independent watch dogs for the American people, they are responsible for ensuring that the federal government agencies operate efficiently, effectively and legally.
If you may recall Bush did exactly the same thing, Repubs at the time said it was his right, so there is NO issue. Enough said.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
If you may recall Bush did exactly the same thing
Link?

Quote:
Repubs at the time said it was his right, so there is NO issue. Enough said.
I think you are confusing IGs (Inspector Generals) with AGs (Attorney Generals) - why does that not surprise me?

AGs can be hired and fired by the president.

IGs are under the jurisdiction of Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,534,474 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
If you may recall Bush did exactly the same thing, Repubs at the time said it was his right, so there is NO issue. Enough said.
Casper
You couldn't be more wrong. President Bush fired Attorney Generals. President Obama fired Inspector Generals in violation of the law he voted for while a US Senator. According to the law he must give Congess 30 days notice and reason for the firing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Obama probably wants to bring in his people who won't cause too much of a stir and praise how his plans are working so well that nothing needs to be inspected.

The small pieces of the puzzle don't mean much but if you put them all together a bigger picture emerges of where this country is heading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
You couldn't be more wrong. President Bush fired Attorney Generals. President Obama fired Inspector Generals in violation of the law he voted for while a US Senator. According to the law he must give Congess 30 days notice and reason for the firing.
But this is Obama. He's not Bush and he's not Republican. Obama can do whatever he wants..he's the messiah remember ?

The law only seems to be broken when it's a Republican doing it. Democrats have excuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
White House refuses to answer Senate questions on AmeriCorps IG firing | Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/NEW-White-House-refuses-to-answer-Senates-questions-on-AmeriCorps-IG-firing-48285832.html - broken link)

Quote:
White House refuses to answer Senate questions on AmeriCorps IG firing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2009, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,534,474 times
Reputation: 8075
Bush and his people gave a reason for the AG firing and the press, minus FOX news, didn't believe him and went after him like pitbulls on a toddler. Obama fires politically independent investigators in violation of the law he voted for and the press (majority of press) are so quiet you can hear the crickets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top