Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-09-2009, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Obama Can't Be Trusted With Numbers - WSJ.com

Quote:
In February, President Barack Obama signed a $787 billion stimulus bill while making lavish promises about the results. He pledged that "a new wave of innovation, activity and construction will be unleashed all across America." He also said the stimulus would "save or create up to four million jobs." Vice President Joe Biden said the massive federal spending plan would "drop-kick" the economy out of the recession.
Quote:
But what is striking about this president is how quickly he turns away from his promises. He rushed the stimulus through Congress saying we couldn't afford to wait. Now his administration is waiting to spend the money. Of the $279 billion allocated to federal agencies, only $56 billion has been paid out.
Why the lag? You know, if you would have put the stimulus directly into the pockets of consumers, things would be much different.

Quote:
Mr. Biden has admitted that the administration "misread" the economy. But he explained that away on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" on Sunday by saying the administration had used "the consensus figures and most of the blue chip indexes out there" to draw up its stimulus plan. That's not true.

The Blue Chip consensus is an average of some four dozen economic forecasts. In January, the consensus estimated that GDP for 2009 would shrink by 1.6% and that unemployment would top out at 8.3%. Team Obama assumed both higher GDP growth (it counted on a contraction of 1.2%) and lower peak unemployment (8.1%) than the consensus.
They continue to lie about the "concensus". And the media let's them get away with it.

Quote:
This fits a pattern. The administration consistently pledges unrealistic results that it later distances itself from.

The stimulus package is a clear example of how Mr. Obama operates. He is attempting to employ the same tactics of bait-and-switch when it comes to health care, only on a much larger scale.

Mr. Obama has already created a river of red ink. His health-care plans will only force that river over its banks. We are at the cusp of a crucial political debate, and Mr. Obama's words on fiscal matters are untrustworthy. His promised savings are a mirage. His proposals to reshape the economy are alarming. And his unwillingness to be forthright with his numbers reveals that he knows his plans would terrify many Americans.
The other pattern? Demonizing those who disagree with his policies - Shareholders, investors, financial executives, energy companies, health professionals, small business, the "rich" - they are all the bad guys according to obama's tactical playbook - the very people that drive the economy.

Oh, one more thing; We all know Rove worked for Bush, is evil incarnate and is the spawn of the devil and needs to be in jail - but just try and refute his points, for once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:30 PM
 
Location: North Texas
382 posts, read 954,343 times
Reputation: 262
Snake oil from the savior. Americans got duped and they ain't seen nothin yet. Will America be stupid enough for a second round of irresponsible spending?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:36 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,052,792 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by expgc View Post
Snake oil from the savior. Americans got duped and they ain't seen nothin yet. Will America be stupid enough for a second round of irresponsible spending?
conmen usually do not use the same mathematical methods honest Americans do. They tend to skew their numbers then come up with a slew of rationalizations of why they are right.




Noun: con man (con men) kón man
  1. A swindler who exploits the confidence of his victim
WordWeb Online Dictionary and Thesaurus
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top