Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't understand why the Anti-Obama crowd is so very Anti-Michelle. She is a very visible and proactive First Lady unlike Laura "Kmart Greeter" Bush who barely left the White House.
By the way, what did Laura Bush do during her 8 years as First Lady? Obviuosly nothing of note.
No she only did things for HIV/AIDS, Malaria, heart disease, Alzheimer's, child abuse, education, etc, etc, etc...nothing important. Just little bull$hit causes.
Seems to me that no first lady needs this many staff members. Four or five I'll grant you - but not as many as either Laura Bush or Michelle Obama have/had.
Politicians - and in this case, thier wives - have forgotten that they are public servants and that the public are paying for their 'perks'. We are out of money and the perks need to stop.
Agreed. There is so much waste in government, we could at least reduce the number of servants for the First Lady. Like you said, they only need 4 at the most. Apparently when 0bama was going on about claiming he was looking hard to find ways to save money in his administration, he did not cut his wife's staff.
I'll bet the speaker of the house has like 300 in her staff. no wonder they never read anything, they have servants doing the mundane things for them. Fricking royalty.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.