Congratulations poor people, now we're paying for your butts (generations, Pittsburgh, examples)

[sanrene]

YOU have the bloody C H O I C E as to which insurance you want...UHC or private!!

The goal of obama and the dem/libs is to get rid of private insurers.

[hotair2]

Originally Posted by sanrene

Ever hear of rationing? That's what will happen. Someone will decide that an 80 year old with a devastating sickness does not justify the cost to keep him alive.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/ma...er=rss&emc=rss

Insurance companies already make these decisions. This topic on RATIONING has been covered. Anymore buzz words from the Health Care Industry propoganda machine?

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by delusianne

Is it a hard concept for you, too?

If you could just give me the number of any of the legislation that passed, I could *try* to figure it out on my own. Not promising I'll ever be able to, mind you.

I see I am correct you think the healthcare fairy will pay for it. Sigh. Your dear party has promised to raise taxes on the rich. I can understand why you don't believe them as they do have a hard time with the truth. But they never lie about raising taxes.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by sanrene

The goal of obama and the dem/libs is to get rid of private insurers.

Demons aren't they? How dare we take the profit out of sickness and misfortune????

[delusianne]

Originally Posted by shorebaby

I see I am correct you think the healthcare fairy will pay for it. Sigh. Your dear party has promised to raise taxes on the rich. I can understand why you don't believe them as they do have a hard time with the truth. But they never lie about raising taxes.

Oh no, you mean this ISNT an actual Act on the books? After all these posts, it turns out the rich not only are NOT being taxed "again", they havent even been taxed YET? Why didntcha just say so?

[Geechie North]

Originally Posted by sanrene

Other polls say something else.

Rasmussen Reports™: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/healthcare/july_2009/49_oppose_health_care_reform_plan_46_favor_it - broken link)

Rasmussen is questionable at best.

But the problem you have here with this poll is that it does not apply to the issue (taxing the rich) being discussed here.

[big daryle]

Originally Posted by ryanst530

45% tax now on $1 million earners

All of this to now pay for Bama's health care plan. Your thoughts?

The Associated Press: House plan boosts taxes on rich to 20-year high

It should be over 90% like it was in the 40's and 50's.

[hotair2]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

Demons aren't they? How dare we take the profit out of sickness and misfortune????

Maybe sanrene works for a private insurer. That would explain a great deal.

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by delusianne

Oh no, you mean this ISNT actual legislation? After all these posts, it turns out the rich not only are NOT being taxed "again", they havent even been taxed YET? You coulda just said so.

I was not aware the rich were not being taxed, you mean their tax rate is zero oh my.

I posted the definition for again I suggest you review it then come back to class.

Taxes will be raised on the rich according to the dems to pay for Healthcare.

Then they will need to raise taxes to pay off the huge debt being wracked up.

Hence the use of the word again.

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by big daryle

It should be over 90% like it was in the 40's and 50's.

Why not take everything from everybody then have the government give everybody the same amount of money! It worked so well in the past.