Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-20-2009, 06:35 AM
 
7,931 posts, read 9,156,295 times
Reputation: 9351

Advertisements

Much has been rightfully lamented about the constant increase in rates for private health insurance over the past 15 years. Blame has been placed on CEO salaries, excessive commercials, and a generalized greedy attitude.

While all of the above may be true, isn't it the job of the individual state's insurance board to approve the rate in premiums? Why did they approve the increase if it wasn't shown that the increase was needed?

Maybe stricter regulation of the private companies would have prevented the excessive healthcare inflation that has made health insurance so unaffordable.

The administration frequently quips that a public plan would help keep the private plans "honest". Well, that job was supposed to be done by govt, namely the state insurance boards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2009, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,202,662 times
Reputation: 27914
Who knows ...maybe it's just a game.
Ins Co wants 15% so asks for 30% and the state board gives 15% and looks like they're doing their job

A current request.

Blumenthal urges rejection of Anthem health insurance rate increase - The Advocate (http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/ci_12772771?source=most_emailed - broken link)

"Blumenthal urges rejection of Anthem health insurance rate increase
The 22 percent to 30 percent increase request is "virtually unprecedented in its magnitude and is completely unjustified factually or legally by anything the company has submitted," state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said.
A spokeswoman for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Connecticut said the company regularly evaluates its rates to make sure the premium payments cover claim costs and expenses.
Increases in claim costs have surpassed premium increases enough to require that Anthem increase its rates, said Sarah Yeager, the company's director of corporate communications.
In a statement, state Insurance Commissioner Thomas Sullivan said that while he agrees certain increases are too high, some level of increase will be necessary."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top