Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2009, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Louisville KY Metro area
4,826 posts, read 14,314,005 times
Reputation: 2159

Advertisements

From an $8000 tax credit to a $4500 clunker to a multi-billion dollar bailout of banks and other oligopolies, I believe that we must all stop and ask each other and ourselves, "was it worth it?" I fear we have had the most unintentional redistribution of wealth since the 1917 Russian Revolution, but unlike what Joe the Plumber feared, the wealth went to the rich not the poor.

To my dear young Gen Y's, in 1972, I was a big fan of George McGovern, 1976, 1980 it was Jimmy Carter, and I genuinely believed as you in governmental redistribution. It took me 30 plus years to realize that the professors were teaching bunk and the Pastors were teaching truth. If you are a genuine liberal, I hope that as I did, you will start asking more questions. Or are you just a lemming being led by a Pied Piper rather than using your wonderfully gifted brain to think for yourself? Think about it, why did you put in that earring, tattoo, wear pink hair, etc. Odd how we try to be so different by being so much like others...

Last edited by tomocox; 08-06-2009 at 05:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:36 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20885
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomocox View Post
From an $8000 tax credit to a $4500 clunker to a multi-billion dollar bailout of banks and other oligopolies, I believe that we must all stop and ask each other and ourselves, "was it worth it?" I fear we have had the most unintentional redistribution of wealth since the 1917 Russian Revolution, but unlike what Joe the Plumber feared, the wealth went to the rich not the poor.

To my dear young Gen Y's, in 1972, I was a big fan of George McGovern, 1976, 1980 it was Jimmy Carter, and I genuinely believed as you in governmental redistribution. It took me 30 plus years to realize that the professors were teaching bunk and the Pastors were teaching truth. If you are a genuine liberal, I hope that as I did, you will start asking more questions. Or are you just a lemming being led by a Pied Piper rather than using your wonderfully gifted brain to think for yourself? Think about it, why did you put in that earring, tattoo, wear pink hair, etc. Odd how we try to be so different by being so much like others...
Many of these folks did not experience McGovern or the Carter administration. Rather than reading about the failures of socialism, they prefer to live the experiment, just one more time, so the memory will be strong. It will make "liberal" a dirty word again for 30 years until the next generation forgets again. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler promised "change" and they delivered on thier promises. Sometimes change is not so good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:14 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Many of these folks did not experience McGovern or the Carter administration. Rather than reading about the failures of socialism, they prefer to live the experiment, just one more time, so the memory will be strong. It will make "liberal" a dirty word again for 30 years until the next generation forgets again. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler promised "change" and they delivered on thier promises. Sometimes change is not so good.
The daily "the Russians are Coming the Russians are coming!"

Who experienced McGovern other than those who campaigned for hims and what "socialist" policies did Carter pursue? Even though I was working in Washington during his administration, I must have missed them.

As for Liberal being a dirty word, I don't remember a time it wasn't a dirty word, especially coming out of the bile filled mouths of folks like Joe McCarthy, Estes Kefaufer, Barry Goldwater, George Wallace, Lester Maddox, Strom Thurmond and Spiro T. Agnew.

As for promising change, you must have missed the Contract for America; the record level deficits, rampant deregulation, the savings and loan crisis, and the beginning of the decline of the American middle class. Thousand points of kinder gentler American anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
IMHO Crony Capitalism, were government money is collected from the middle class and lavished on personal and politically connected friends and relatives, is the most efficient way to redistribute money from the productive to the plutocracy. The Republicans and the Neocons have been very efficient with this redistribution from the bottom and middle to the top. They consistently take from the worker bees to feed the drones and the Queen. Some of us are tired of feeding the useless even more of our money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:24 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,506,170 times
Reputation: 22753
All these federal regs are what have crippled this country in the past and will cripple this country in the future.

If states functioned w/o dipping into federal coffers, then 1. our state budgets would be balanced and 2. the federal government would not need to keep imposing additional taxes in order to raise money for all the entitlement programs the federal coffers now support.

I re-read the Constitution recently and I don't understand why the feds have gotten so involved in state programs. If folks live in a state wh/ can't afford certain programs - then they should either plan on not having access to those programs - or move. This is not hard. Let states attract businesses, collect revenue from the citizens and corps in those states and create (or dump) programs that these states can afford.

We have become a nation of debtors and it starts at the grassroots level.

We may be redistributing wealth ON PAPER, but seeing as how the federal government is in debt - and we are operating on Funny Money borrowed from other countries (China and Dubai being two prominent lenders) . . . there is no real wealth being distributed. It is all just a shell game.

Time to insist that state budgets get balanced and that legislators refuse to participate in federal programs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:25 AM
 
769 posts, read 887,801 times
Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomocox View Post
To my dear young Gen Y's, in 1972, I was a big fan of George McGovern, 1976, 1980 it was Jimmy Carter, and I genuinely believed as you in governmental redistribution. It took me 30 plus years to realize that the professors were teaching bunk and the Pastors were teaching truth.

I tried my best to learn from past mistakes so I wouldn't have to repeat them. The product of that was coming out of the shute on the 'right' side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,057,017 times
Reputation: 4125
Most people have never even experienced a communist or socialist system, they just keep repeating it like a bad word they don't understand because of everything they heard as a child. Those who associate their opposition to every bad thing they ever heard is just doing the same now. The two parties are not really that different in actions, so those who want their party to succeed are just pantomiming old fears to get people worked up.

If people feared and hated socialism so much then our enemies would be Norway and Sweden, which are about the largest and most powerful democratically socialistic countries (kind of sad really).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:34 AM
 
245 posts, read 447,858 times
Reputation: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
As for promising change, you must have missed the Contract for America; the record level deficits, rampant deregulation, the savings and loan crisis, and the beginning of the decline of the American middle class. Thousand points of kinder gentler American anyone?
Agreed, the US has suffered greatly from the aforementioned blunders. And OTaxya and the rest of the liberal fascists' redistribution of wealth and hastily prepared regulations will greatly compound the problems leftover from Bushy's reign of incompetence.

Socialism = Trickle-up Poverty!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
Socialism is not set up to destroy free markets but crony capitalist government supported monopolists most definitely are. Markets are destroyed by businessmen to avoid the annoyance of price competition. It is very difficult to make a profit in a completely free and open market. it is far less expensive to count on your friends in high places to protect your monopoly.


Liberal fascists???? That is a perfect oxymoron.

Last edited by GregW; 08-06-2009 at 07:41 AM.. Reason: added line of text
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 07:41 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,916,363 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
IMHO Crony Capitalism, were government money is collected from the middle class and lavished on personal and politically connected friends and relatives, is the most efficient way to redistribute money from the productive to the plutocracy. The Republicans and the Neocons have been very efficient with this redistribution from the bottom and middle to the top. They consistently take from the worker bees to feed the drones and the Queen. Some of us are tired of feeding the useless even more of our money.
and some of you don't seem to understand that you are still doing it! right now there is a new proposal for taxpayers to assume the bad assets of fannie mae and freddie mac. americans didn't cause this derivative disaster, but they are being expected to pay for it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top