Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Women seeking an abortion must be told that the procedure ends a human life, a federal judge ruled Thursday, upholding part of a South Dakota law.
U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier said doctors must disclose to pregnant women that “the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being.”
You are more concerned with defending abstract principles of liberty than a human life?
By trampling the liberties of the doctor and the woman, to protect the liberty of something that isn't even a human. It doesn't suit you, to talk about personal liberties.
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,758,986 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings
You are more concerned with defending abstract principles of liberty than a human life?
It is not a human life. It is a FETUS- a clump of cells no different than those of a dog or a plant. It is not human until it is born or close to being born. And until it is a human it should be left 100% up to the woman.
Because we stand for the woman's right to control her own body. We stand for the born.
There are two lives involved. One is ended forever. Once is temporarily inconvienced. It is NOT only her body involved. Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn child. At one point in time all of us...women included...were at the mercy of our mother's "choice." I will always believe that choosing life over temporary inconvience is the humane and human choice.
There are two lives involved. One is ended forever. Once is temporarily inconvienced. It is NOT only her body involved. Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn child. At one point in time all of us...women included...were at the mercy of our mother's "choice." I will always believe that choosing life over temporary inconvience is the humane and human choice.
See you have the CHOICE to think that " choosing life over temporary inconvience is the humane and human choice".
We also have the choice. That choice resides with the woman!
There are two lives involved. One is ended forever. Once is temporarily inconvienced. It is NOT only her body involved. Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn child. At one point in time all of us...women included...were at the mercy of our mother's "choice." I will always believe that choosing life over temporary inconvience is the humane and human choice.
You can be a human incubator for all I care but don't tell other women that they need to be one as well.
Life doesn't begin until the fetus is viable outside the body. Before 21 weeks, it isn't viable.
What about the mother's life? Should she have to subject her body to pregnancy to satisfy some rabid right winger who doesn't give a damn about her?
If you're for life, are you for universal health care?
There are two lives involved. One is ended forever. Once is temporarily inconvienced. It is NOT only her body involved.
Stop right there. Pregnancy causes death. Not often but it does. Pregnancy causes other problems minimized by you use of "inconvenienced". How insulting to women. Every woman has the right to chose the risks she wants to take each and every time she becomes pregnant.
You go right ahead and make your choices about what you want to do with your body but you have no right to make the choices for other women.
No, it wasn't a bureaucrat, it was an activist judge.
President Clinton appointed an activist judge?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.