Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-26-2009, 03:45 AM
 
20,349 posts, read 19,941,445 times
Reputation: 13466

Advertisements

"Democrats are looking for ways to exclude a bevy of big groups from their proposal to tax so-called Cadillac health insurance plans. So far the list of groups seeking exclusions include labor unions, firefighters, coal miners and other high risk occupations."....

Why don't they just throw in college professors, community activists and actors?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Millions-of-federal-employees-might-be-exempt-from-health-benefits-tax--65293422.html# (broken link)

A**holes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2009, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,451,194 times
Reputation: 5047
I'm a federal retiree, so I can't claim to be impartial on this. That said, my health care plan does not come especially close to the $8,000 ceiling (the threshold for "Cadillac" plans), so as things stand now, a health benefits tax won't affect me.

However, I think they need to re-examine the $8,000 threshold to make sure they aren't including Chevys along with the Cadillacs. $8,000 may be too low, given how expensive health care insurance is in this country right now.

Whatever amount they finally agree on (even if it's $8,000), I would prefer that no group be excluded, although I am sympathetic to the reality that those in high risk occupations may be required to pay substantially more for their health care insurance, and may therefore be kicked up to "Cadillac" status in terms of cost but perhaps not in terms of coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2009, 07:45 AM
 
30,075 posts, read 18,682,634 times
Reputation: 20894
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc1 View Post
"Democrats are looking for ways to exclude a bevy of big groups from their proposal to tax so-called Cadillac health insurance plans. So far the list of groups seeking exclusions include labor unions, firefighters, coal miners and other high risk occupations."....

Why don't they just throw in college professors, community activists and actors?

Millions of federal employees might be exempt from health benefits tax | Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Millions-of-federal-employees-might-be-exempt-from-health-benefits-tax--65293422.html# - broken link)

A**holes.

Who would expect anything different from Bammer. It is Chicago style politics on a national scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top