Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay, let's hear it from the wing nuts. Let's hear the argument that crimes against homosexuals shouldn't be regarded as a hate crime. So crimes against individuals for their sexual orientation is not worthy of hate crime status. Again, by wing nuts, I'm not referring to the majority of sane and logical Republicans and conservatives but the vocal minority of extremists in our party.
Okay, let's hear it from the wing nuts. Let's hear the argument that crimes against homosexuals shouldn't be regarded as a hate crime. So crimes against individuals for their sexual orientation is not worthy of hate crime status. Again, by wing nuts, I'm not referring to the majority of sane and logical Republicans and conservatives but the vocal minority of extremists in our party.
What number of violations to a group or subject must be hit before it becomes a hate crime? I am just wondering as when I was in school, a group of kids beat up a red headed kid calling him carrot cake. Shouldn't his case also contain extra penalties due to its discriminating nature? There are numerous other cases of different groups as well. Goth kids tend to get beat up a bit and so did the role playing kids. Are they to be ignored? Are the crimes against them less important even if the outcome is equally severe?
Okay, let's hear it from the wing nuts. Let's hear the argument that crimes against homosexuals shouldn't be regarded as a hate crime.
You are obviously trolling and trying to entice a flame war. There is a difference between opposing the concept of "hate crimes" and finding the idea of violent crimes against anyone repulsive.
Quote:
So crimes against individuals for their sexual orientation is not worthy of hate crime status. Again, by wing nuts, I'm not referring to the majority of sane and logical Republicans and conservatives but the vocal minority of extremists in our party.
Of course wacky liberals like this legislation. It came in attached to a $680-billion measure outlining the Pentagon’s budget, which includes $130 billion for ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Kucinich voted against it since he thought war was the most offensive hate crime and I agree.
Theses anti-war liberals were never anti-war. They were anti-Republican war. That is why they threw Cindy Sheehan under the bus and could care less about engaging in a war admist a severe economic crisis and with no timeline. But as long as they can get their hate crime legislation against gays passed at the sacrifice of their wishy-washy principles, then they are elated.
so will they be wearing id tags or will you just have to ask are you gay if a guy starts crap wih you? seems the latter would actually start a fight. very scary
What is a wing nut? Do you refer to one in terms of mental stature or that of political reference, or the metal fastener cap for a bolt?
Here is how I am using it:
A wingnut is an individual whose ideology is so far from the center that they have lost their point of reference and as a result, have no idea how far outside of societal norms their views are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
