Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2009, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,285,313 times
Reputation: 9002

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtoli View Post
Declaring H1N1 a national emergency allows stockpiles of medication to be freed up. Did you even read the article you linked?
WTF difference does that make?!
Did you even read the post that I was responding to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2009, 10:59 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,665,293 times
Reputation: 2829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
WTF difference does that make?!
Did you even read the post that I was responding to?
Yes, I did read the post you were responding to.

The difference it makes is that Obama declaring it a National Emergency was not because people should flip out and panic due to a flu - He simply declared it as such to free up additional resources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
We should all have had the shot for this flu available by last September. He is responsible for that. Actually he doesn't take responsibility for anything. I am sure Bush is at fault because we don't have the vaccine.

It is one thing to see the statistics. It is another when you see the people in intensive care. Some of them did not die, but they have after effects from this flu. Sorry excuse for a president.

I forgot to add. I think it is interesting that he made sure his criminal friends got the shot before the rest of us. He said he felt responsible for them. When is he going to start realizing his first responsibility is to the American people. We seem to always come out last in his priorities, expecially senior citizens.
Obama is responsible for the virus not growing well in the eggs? As someone else said, maybe he should have gone in to the lab and entertained it or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Over There
5,094 posts, read 5,441,102 times
Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
It took 7 years for the American death toll (from all causes including non-combat deaths) to reach 4000. It has taken 7 months for the virus to exact the same toll, mostly among the very young. This will soon become a political problem for the Obama administration, in addition to being a public health catastrophe. The administration has totally botched the government response to this pandemic.


Funny because according to the CDC as of 10/31/09 only 672 people have died in the US.

CDC 2009 H1N1 Flu | 2009 H1N1 U.S. Situation Update
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Really?

CDC Novel H1N1 Flu | CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths in the United States

Deaths
0-17 years ~540 ~300 to ~800
18-64 years ~2,920 ~1,900 to ~4,600
65 years and older ~440 ~300 to ~700
Deaths Total ~3,900 ~2,500 to ~6,100
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Over There
5,094 posts, read 5,441,102 times
Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Really?

CDC Novel H1N1 Flu | CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths in the United States

Deaths
0-17 years ~540 ~300 to ~800
18-64 years ~2,920 ~1,900 to ~4,600
65 years and older ~440 ~300 to ~700
Deaths Total ~3,900 ~2,500 to ~6,100

That is ESTIMATES the actual is only 672.


I guess there estimates were WAAAAAAAY off consider the reporting time is as of November 3rd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:02 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,310,171 times
Reputation: 4894
One more time

OBAMA SAID THIS WAS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT!!

How quickly people seem to forget who was wrong once again.

Thanks for not taking care of this issue Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber Queen View Post
That is ESTIMATES the actual is only 672.


I guess there estimates were WAAAAAAAY off consider the reporting time is as of November 3rd.
Those are people who tested positive for H1N1. That is an expensive test and is only done on selected hospitalized people. Dr's office tests only test for type A influenza, 99% of which are H1N1, based on the above testing. Most people are not even tested, b/c if you are low risk, you are told to stay home and treat your symptoms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Over There
5,094 posts, read 5,441,102 times
Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Those are people who tested positive for H1N1. That is an expensive test and is only done on selected hospitalized people. Dr's office tests only test for type A influenza, 99% of which are H1N1, based on the above testing. Most people are not even tested, b/c if you are low risk, you are told to stay home and treat your symptoms.

No the OP said 4000 people had died and that is NOT true only 672 have. You posted an article that clearly says ESTIMATE through out the entire thing. The actual number are in the link I provided by the CDC and are as of November 3rd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber Queen View Post
No the OP said 4000 people had died and that is NOT true only 672 have. You posted an article that clearly says ESTIMATE through out the entire thing. The actual number are in the link I provided by the CDC and are as of November 3rd.
"Only" 672 deaths have been positively linked to H1N1. Not everyone who has died has been tested for it. Please try to understand this process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top