Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:15 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,196,047 times
Reputation: 4027

Advertisements

The beleaguered Washington Times announced "significant" reductions to its staff of 370 today.
In response to "marketplace realities", "the company is aggressively working to achieve efficiencies of scale that must include significant staff reduction of its 370 personnel," said Publisher Jonathan Slevin.

Late Update: Now we know. The layoffs announced equal 40% of the staff of the paper. Brutal.

Washington Times Announces 'Significant Staff Reduction' | TPM LiveWire
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:19 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,916,363 times
Reputation: 4459
that is sad, and i hate to see working americans out of a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:19 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,787 posts, read 8,030,764 times
Reputation: 6691
they should try giving discounted Palin books with each new subscribtion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:22 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828
They are not producing anything the public is willing to buy. Sad but a cyclical part of business. There are some papers that are surviving via their internet presence because people want to read what is written on their pages.

How long until the taxpayer funded "bail-out" for the printed press begins?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:22 PM
 
Location: OB
2,404 posts, read 3,948,874 times
Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
The layoffs announced equal 40% of the staff of the paper.
Ouch. Brutal indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:41 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayThom View Post
They were a good counter-balance to the despised WaPo.
Despised? Maybe by some narrow-minded right-wingers, but that's about it.

Washington Post circulation:

673,180 Daily
890,163 Sunday

Washington Times circulation:

83,511 Daily
43,889 Sunday
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:53 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayThom View Post
Lots of cities have become one newspaper towns. That doesn't mean that the WaPo is liked. Look at the Chicago Trib, which has larger circ numbers -- it's despised by "narrow-minded unintelligent left-wingers" but it's still the top circ paper in the city.
Yes, but the Washington Times has been around for a long time. If the Washington Post was truly despised and the Times was a good alternative, the Times' circulation numbers would have been far higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:55 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095
Any rag paper owned by someone like the Reverend Sun Myung Moon should become obsolete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:57 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayThom View Post
The NY Times is despised by millions, despite having good circ numbers. I don't see why you don't understand this concept.
I understand it perfectly. I've made my point already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 04:01 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,916,363 times
Reputation: 4459
the washington post is laying off as well.

And now The Washington Post is laying off staff, sources told me on Friday, and a spokeswoman confirmed.

The Post has cut an unknown number of washingtonpost.com workers, the website folks who until now have worked separately at the dot-com headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, across the river from the Post’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. One source told me up to 10 are going. That’s not as big a number as other places you’ve read about lately, but it’s still a painful cut. (Disclosure: I worked for The Washington Post Co. from 1998 to 2005)

Sources shared several names with me, but until those people confirm that they were laid off, I don’t want to publish them. What I can say is that there were several journalists and marketing people among the casualties. They are getting severance packages, but they are accompanied by non-disclosure agreements which prevent them from discussing their firings. Apparently, some of my sources said, they will be out of work by Dec. 31. (reuters blog)

i feel sorry for all americans losing their jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top