Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2009, 06:55 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
I disagree.

There is very little difference between Visa and Mastercard.
There is a HUGE difference between Visa and Mastercard
Mastercard market value = $33.3Billion
Visa market value = $64.4Billion

If you guys think that Visa/MC sales are representative of the economy, then tell me why they both had 10% increased in sales through 2008/2009 while the economy tanked? It just means people are moving other payments to these credit cards. AMEX for example is seeing a 15-20% decrease in revenues..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2009, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
3,390 posts, read 4,953,197 times
Reputation: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
The numbers are from a company which tracks MasterCard

And purchases using MasterCard represents a huge percentange of holiday sales, so their numbers should be pretty accurate.

In retail, initial daily retail sales numbers are known the very next day.

Adjusted sales numbers (after sales audits are done to certain individual transactions) are available within several days of the sales day.

So these initial next day sales numbers should be pretty close to the final number.
And what percentage of shoppers use Mastercard? That would be a telling figure in all of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 06:58 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,201,005 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Thats like asking why one retail store sales could/would be up, and others down..
How so? A credit card is a credit card, similar interest rates, just a matter which credit card company a person prefers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:02 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The 3.9% is between 2009 and 2008. But don't forget that between 2008 and 2007 the loss was 50%. Yes it's up, but it's up against the worst year ever (2008) for Christmas shopping.

This might be another indication that we've hit bottom.
And its only up because they are taking market shares from other credit card companies.
Amex for example, down 15-20%.

this can not at all be seen as evidence that its a recovery.. Its simply a sign that more people are using credit, just like they did through the economic down years..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:07 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
How so? A credit card is a credit card, similar interest rates, just a matter which credit card company a person prefers.
Because Mastercard sales increased even in years where the economy was awful and tanking...
2006 - $3.3B
2007 - $4.1B
2008 - $5.0B
2009 - $5.1B
2010 - $5.6B

Sales increased even when the GDP was going down.

If your theories that MC sales increases = economic recovery, then you need to explain to me why sales increased during the down years of the economy..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,966,939 times
Reputation: 7118
**crickets**
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:14 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,201,005 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Because Mastercard sales increased even in years where the economy was awful and tanking...
2006 - $3.3B
2007 - $4.1B
2008 - $5.0B
2009 - $5.1B
2010 - $5.6B

Sales increased even when the GDP was going down.

If your theories that MC sales increases = economic recovery, then you need to explain to me why sales increased during the down years of the economy..
Do you have the breakdown for VISA? Btw nowhere did I say MC sales = economic recovery, try putting words in someone elses mouth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:15 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,343,211 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The 3.9% is between 2009 and 2008. But don't forget that between 2008 and 2007 the loss was 50%. Yes it's up, but it's up against the worst year ever (2008) for Christmas shopping.

This might be another indication that we've hit bottom.
2008 was NOT the worst year ever for Christmas shopping. Ugly as it was, when all was said and done it turned out that sales were roughly equivalent to what they had been mid-decade. Still - ANY year that doesn't show an increase is considered a disaster (in part because it doesn't even keep up with population growth).

"In 2008, holiday sales declined 3.4% to $441.97 billion (pg. 6), the first year NRF has seen a decline since it began tracking retail industry sales in 1992. On average, holiday sales have increased 3.39 percent per year for the last ten years."

National Retail Federation -

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:17 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799
2008 was the worst sales in 40 years. Being up 3.6% from that was good news but nothing to take your clothes off and run across the football field for.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...efer=worldwide

Quote:
Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. retailers face a wave of store closings, bankruptcies and takeovers starting next month as holiday sales are shaping up to be the worst in 40 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
2008 was NOT the worst year ever for Christmas shopping. Ugly as it was, when all was said and done it turned out that sales were roughly equivalent to what they had been mid-decade. Still - ANY year that doesn't show an increase is considered a disaster (in part because it doesn't even keep up with population growth).

"In 2008, holiday sales declined 3.4% to $441.97 billion (pg. 6), the first year NRF has seen a decline since it began tracking retail industry sales in 1992. On average, holiday sales have increased 3.39 percent per year for the last ten years."

National Retail Federation -

Ken
I got my -50% in 2008 from this link:
2008 Holiday Shopping
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top