Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is really your issue, huh? You tend to only post when something emerges about this issue.
Anyway, you're drawing a false positive conclusion on this one. You're saying: Because of A, B must be concluded.
Because one or two studies were compromised does not provide evidence that the thousands of other studies are equally compromised. Therefore, you simply cannot draw a broader conclusion about the issue of global warming from an isolated incident.
Some scientists are unethical, I shudder to think.
The fact is, the evidence for climate change is there. There is a lot of good evidence. That doesn't mean we should destroy our economy to try and help it. However, a cap and trade system, responsibly done, won't destroy our economy.
He mentioned new nuclear plants, and investing in Green energy. Those kinds of things just make sense. If we can develop a clean coal system, we can sell that to China, as well as keep feeding them coal, which is the best thing we can do for our economy.
All these expert analyses from high school drop outs and journalism majors making these global observations from their driveways.
Yawn, you woke me up for this?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
