Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2010, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,563,875 times
Reputation: 14862

Advertisements

Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ - CNN.com

"Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly."

"The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them."

"Kanazawa did not find that higher or lower intelligence predicted sexual exclusivity in women. This makes sense, because having one partner has always been advantageous to women, even thousands of years ago, meaning exclusivity is not a "new" preference."

Very interesting. Makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2010, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,530,289 times
Reputation: 7807
Is he saying that promiscous, conservative Christian's are a bunch of comparative dumb azzes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:07 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Liberal atheist here - and above average in intelligence.

Last edited by AnUnidentifiedMale; 02-26-2010 at 07:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:11 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Sounds like trash "research" to me motivated by politics...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:24 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Sounds like trash "research" to me motivated by politics...
If you read the story, you'll see that the two researchers describe themselves as "conservative" and "strongly libertarian".

Hopefully you're not dismissing the results simply because they don't flatter you as a conservative.

Last edited by AnUnidentifiedMale; 02-26-2010 at 08:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:38 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,125,541 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimbochick View Post
Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ - CNN.com

"Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly."

"The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them."

"Kanazawa did not find that higher or lower intelligence predicted sexual exclusivity in women. This makes sense, because having one partner has always been advantageous to women, even thousands of years ago, meaning exclusivity is not a "new" preference."

Very interesting. Makes sense to me.
It is very interesting and the other day on anti-gay thread, I said that maybe in days of old, nature needed assure that the population grew. Now that we are over populated, homosexulaity can come of age for a portion of the population. As for religion, way back when if there were not a set of laws to guide people it would have been utter chaos. If we are this stupid and ignorant now, can you imagine the average person back then? Yes, we still need rules and laws, but the Bible put the fear of God into people and that is what was necessary to keep the superstitious lot in line.

Last edited by sickofnyc; 02-26-2010 at 07:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:40 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
If you read the story, you'll see that the two researchers describe themselves as "conservative" and "strongly libertarian".

I guess it's easier to just dismiss the results if you disagree with them.
I've seen enough of these studies claiming mental/intelligence/educational deficiency/superiority amongst every political group, liberal, conservative, libertarian, etc., to place absolutely no value in them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,289,753 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
I've seen enough of these studies claiming mental/intelligence/educational deficiency/superiority amongst every political group, liberal, conservative, libertarian, etc., to place absolutely no value in them.
Ok?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 08:01 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,787 posts, read 8,029,439 times
Reputation: 6686
I'll take common sense over a high IQ any day
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 08:10 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by parfleche View Post
I'll take common sense over a high IQ any day
George W. Bush campaigned as the "common sense" candidate, and look what happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top