Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here's an insightful piece in Britain's Financial Times, a bastion of conservative viewpoints, at least financially. The article is worth reading.
Excerpt:
- Battling my way through Palin’s book, I began to wonder how American conservatism had come to this. Ms Palin’s book is smug, lightweight, nationalistic, entirely free of original ideas. How has this woman become the darling of the American right? ... then I realised – the rot set in with Ronald Reagan. This might seem an odd conclusion, since President Reagan is a conservative hero ... ideas now known as “Reaganism" are profoundly subversive of the most important conservative values. Traditional conservatives disdain populism and respect knowledge. They believe in balancing the government’s books. And they are pragmatists who are suspicious of ideology. Reagan debased all these ideas – and modern American conservatism is still suffering the consequences.
There's good info in the article detailing the how conservatives, or at least much of the GOP membership, traded their legendary intellectualism for common ignorance, which we see on public display in town hall meetings and tea party mob scenes.
Yes, I voted for Reagan both times, but was appalled all along at trickle down economics, tax cuts made with red ink, the S&L scandal, arms for hostages and much more.
History's long view of Reagan will be mixed; his worst failing being that he set the stage for the unmitigated disaster that was Bush-43, an economic calamity that has been unfolding for several years, and the 2008 election debacle that was McCain/Palin.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reagan was conservatism and led the movement brilliantly.
That he did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Remember when he came into office the Highest marginal tax rate was approx 70%.
Yip.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Think on that! Working to give up 70% to the government.
Have done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
His policies resulted in the greatest expansion of revenues to the Treasury in history.
Yes but at what cost? The 15X run up in stock prices is going to just come down to less than where it was when it started. The total debt in America is at 350% of GDP. At the peek in the Great Depression it was only 260% to 299% depending on the source. The taxes on that stock market bubble are not sustainable income. His policies ruined America.
What about Grenada? Marxist rebels attacked and killed the island's prime minister and overthrew the island's constitutional government. Communist Cuba had fortified it and taken U.S. citizens hostage. Reagan sent troops in after leaders of other Caribbean islands asked him to intervene. So why are you whining about Grenada?
Quote:
Massive buildup of deficit. Reducing taxes and still spending gobs of money is NOT conservative, not by a long shot.
The Democrat-controlled Congress back in the '80s spent, on average, 2.8% more than Reagan asked for. And a cumulative 24.5% over 8 years. Every balanced budget Reagan presented to Congress was declared DOA by Tip O'Neil.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet
What about Grenada? Marxist rebels attacked and killed the island's prime minister and overthrew the island's constitutional government. Communist Cuba had fortified it and taken U.S. citizens hostage. Reagan sent troops in after leaders of other Caribbean islands asked him to intervene. So why are you whining about Grenada?
You mean the invasion denounced by the UN as a flagrant violation of international law? I guess the UN is only handy when violations of its sanctions can be used as alleged justification for other invasions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.