Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,102,329 times
Reputation: 2972

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
Can Mrs. Chief Justice be far behind?
Wouldn't be surprised if MR. Chief Justice wasn't in the front row.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2010, 11:57 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,971,975 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
So the Teabaggers are not racist b/c this woman's husband is Black? No. the Teabaggers are still racist. They never would have protested if a White pOTUS had been elected. Clarence Thomas and his wife are scumbags who only care about their political hides,while ignoring other blacks.
Again we see when there is no legitimate arguement, the "race card" is played.

Its about spending and government over-reaching of its Constitutional power.

Your post itself is racist because you state Justice Thomas and his wife should make a stand based on the color of a groups skin rather than the fact that they are Americans first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,102,329 times
Reputation: 2972
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Actually the supreme court is that 3rd branch everyone forgets.
It is the 3rd leg that keeps check on the other 2 legs.

The other two legs are not going to like that 3rd leg getting in their way to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE USA.

Funny that NOW there are 3 equal but separate parts to our Gov't.

I'm sure Mr. Cheney and his daughter will now have to classify you as part of the Al-Quida 7, since NOW you're saying her father was wrong then as well.

Too bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:00 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,993,992 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Again we see when there is no legitimate arguement, the "race card" is played.

Its about spending and government over-reaching of its Constitutional power.
Ha! That's a laugher.

Every one of these white old fogey rednecks screams with joy everytime the Federal government denies Constitutional rights to someone the government declares to be a "terrorist threat".

Their bottom line: They don't like their tax dollars going to "those people"................. People who are not "real Americans" like themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:00 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,018,707 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Again we see when there is no legitimate arguement, the "race card" is played.

Its about spending and government over-reaching of its Constitutional power.

Your post itself is racist because you state Justice Thomas and his wife should make a stand based on the color of a groups skin rather than the fact that they are Americans first.
Ok, well where were all of the teabaggers when W was bailing out Wall Street bankers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:03 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,971,975 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Ha! That's a laugher.

Every one of these white old fogey rednecks screams with joy everytime the Federal government denies Constitutional rights to someone the government declares to be a "terrorist theat".
Name calling too? How intellegent that makes your failure to provide any substntial argument. NOT.

Last I saw Holder's Justice department was granting every cahrged terrorist full rights of US citizens in civilian court.

Your arguement has more holes than a slice of swiss cheese.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:06 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,993,992 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Name calling too? How intellegent that makes your failure to provide any substntial argument. NOT.

Last I saw Holder's Justice department was granting every cahrged terrorist full rights of US citizens in civilian court.

Your arguement has more holes than a slice of swiss cheese.
And liberal's aggresively oppose Holder and Obama on the civil liberties issues!

It's called "being consistent".....Try is some time!

In fact, do a thread title search under my name with the search word "Obama"

And see how foolish you are!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,026 posts, read 22,198,300 times
Reputation: 13836
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Justice's wife launches 'tea party' group - latimes.com

I know that the spouses of Supreme Court judges are free to become involved in politics, but I think this may be a first.
I suppose you want to claim that a woman's place is in the home?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:10 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,836,596 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Yeah. Hard to play the race card when he's black and she's white.

clarence thomas is a tom, this is the same guy who used the race card when he was under fire for sexual assault i believe and before that he didnt even believe in any of that stuff then he has the nerve to use it lmao.

He's anti black spite being black, he's like a clayton bigsby.. of course you wouldnt know any of that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 12:14 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,971,975 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
clarence thomas is a tom, this is the same guy who used the race card when he was under fire for sexual assault i believe and before that he didnt even believe in any of that stuff then he has the nerve to use it lmao.

He's anti black spite being black, he's like a clayton bigsby.. of course you wouldnt know any of that
Of course, you know Anita Hill was also "black" right?

Isn't calling someone of a certain skin pigment a "tom" racist in itself?

It is actually Justice Thomas's job to interpret laws as they apply to the Constitution, not as they apply to skin color. Is that what you call being "agaist blacks"? Are you suggesting that because a Supreme Court Justice remains neutral and sticks to the Constitution that makes him "against blacks"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top