Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong yet again. In fact, you are on the opposite side of the fence from actual science, and that is why your opinion stands in stark contrast to the 95% of scientists that have actually studied climate change.
The models you dispute you offer no contrary evidence to dispel their validity, that is why any reasonable person not blinded by ideology will agree with science, which is further backed by actual temperature averages, showing that the 10 warmest years in world history have occurred in the past two decades.
Sounds to me like science is supportable by actual measurement, not just models.
One needs evidence to dispel the validity of the models? the IPCC graph shows a 3000 point divergence in the models themselves.
Further, we know for an absolute fact that models cannot tell what the weather will do in 10 days. Yet you need me to provide further evidence that the models are not corrrect?
until the "predictors" get a clue about the real role of water vapor and can get an actual handle on the actual physics related to "forcing", there is no such thing as predicting climate.
none what so ever.
and there is no one on the planet that currently has been able to demonstrate either of these 2 processes (no one has yet to prove that there is such a thing as CO2 forcing)
You you believe in Global warming, then you believe in Al Gore!
Nothing credible about either. Why is the Polar Bear population increasing
and glaciers getting bigger????????
You you believe in Global warming, then you believe in Al Gore!
Nothing credible about either. Why is the Polar Bear population increasing
and glaciers getting bigger????????
There's no logic.
It's so obvious Gore is all about making money not saving the planet.
But you can't persuade a true believer.
Wrong yet again. In fact, you are on the opposite side of the fence from actual science, and that is why your opinion stands in stark contrast to the 95% of scientists that have actually studied climate change.
The models you dispute you offer no contrary evidence to dispel their validity, that is why any reasonable person not blinded by ideology will agree with science, which is further backed by actual temperature averages, showing that the 10 warmest years in world history have occurred in the past two decades.
Sounds to me like science is supportable by actual measurement, not just models.
Underlined and in bold - is completely laughable. Isn't is amazing what lies, and data manipulation can do to warp science?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
