Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2010, 05:37 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

Meeting here in the heart of a once-divided Europe, the two leaders put aside the acrimony that has characterized Russian-American ties in recent years as they agreed to bring down their arsenals and restore an inspection regime that expired in December. Along the way, they sidestepped unresolved disputes over missile defense and other issues.
***
The Russian president signaled general support for the American-led drive to impose new sanctions on Iran, saying that Tehran’s nuclear program has flouted the international community. “We cannot turn a blind eye to this,” Mr. Medvedev said, while adding that sanctions “should be smart” and avoid hardship for the Iranian people.
***
[MOD CUT/copyright]
U.S. and Russia Sign Nuclear Arms Pact - NYTimes.com

Last edited by Ibginnie; 04-08-2010 at 06:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2010, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Default US and Russia sign Arms agreement

The new agreement is signed. In 7 or so years we and Russia will only be able to destroy the world 10 times over.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/...aty/index.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Maine
7,727 posts, read 12,386,209 times
Reputation: 8344
Deja Vu .............. I remember President Kennedy signing an arms treaty back in 1968. Wow does that make me feel old!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:31 AM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,661 posts, read 5,090,317 times
Reputation: 6086
Quote:
Originally Posted by msina View Post
Deja Vu .............. I remember President Kennedy signing an arms treaty back in 1968. Wow does that make me feel old!
President Kennedy in 1968? Wow, not only old but perhaps a bit senile too? That's ok, we're all headed there...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:33 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,021,863 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by msina View Post
Deja Vu .............. I remember President Kennedy signing an arms treaty back in 1968. Wow does that make me feel old!
You must have symptoms of Alzheimer's too
President Kennedy was killed in 1963.

I know what you meant: On August 5, 1963, after more than eight years of difficult negotiations, the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union signed the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:39 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Meeting here in the heart of a once-divided Europe, the two leaders put aside the acrimony that has characterized Russian-American ties in recent years as they agreed to bring down their arsenals and restore an inspection regime that expired in December. Along the way, they sidestepped unresolved disputes over missile defense and other issues.
***
The Russian president signaled general support for the American-led drive to impose new sanctions on Iran, saying that Tehran’s nuclear program has flouted the international community. “We cannot turn a blind eye to this,†Mr. Medvedev said, while adding that sanctions “should be smart†and avoid hardship for the Iranian people.
***
[MOD CUT/copyright]
U.S. and Russia Sign Nuclear Arms Pact - NYTimes.com
Happy to see it.
It's another step in the right direction.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:42 AM
 
3,219 posts, read 6,583,457 times
Reputation: 1852
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Happy to see it.
It's another step in the right direction.

Ken
http://******************/vomit-smiley-9530.gif (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,650 times
Reputation: 208
This is truly wonderful, but there must be more done as 1500+ warheads (for each side) is enough to destroy the earth many times over.

The treaty needs 67 votes in the Senate to ratify. Will the Republicans politicize this issue and not support it? Let's hope not!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 09:20 AM
 
7,331 posts, read 15,391,361 times
Reputation: 3800
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
This is truly wonderful, but there must be more done as 1500+ warheads (for each side) is enough to destroy the earth many times over.

The treaty needs 67 votes in the Senate to ratify. Will the Republicans politicize this issue and not support it? Let's hope not!!
For the moment, I'm less worried about the 1500 nukes each side can keep an eye on and more worried about unsecured nuclear material falling into the hands of a non-state actor. As unstable as Putin and his ventriloquist dummy Medvedev can be, even shoe-banging, "We will bury you" Khrushchev didn't let the birds fly.

The reduction in arms is a victory in maintaining and securing more sustainable quantities of nuclear material.

Only South Africa has ever developed, then voluntarily relinquished, nuclear weapons.

Of the 9 countries currently possessing nukes, the 7 that AREN'T the US or Russia (UK, France, India, Pakistan, China, Israel, and North Korea, just barely) possess fewer than 1,000 devices, high side. While that's getting into scary numbers, it's still nothing compared to the arsenals of the former Cold War superpowers. Since none of these countries are likely to become another South Africa, in terms of nuclear policy, anytime soon, reduction is the only way to ensure better nuclear security from potential secondary-users.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 09:20 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
This is truly wonderful, but there must be more done as 1500+ warheads (for each side) is enough to destroy the earth many times over.

The treaty needs 67 votes in the Senate to ratify. Will the Republicans politicize this issue and not support it? Let's hope not!!
What do you mean?
We can't let the Russians destroy the world before we do!
Do you want the rest of the world to think Americans are a bunch of WIMPS!!!!!!

LOL

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top