Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:04 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Well guess what? The commies weren't exactly voted into power in Russia either. They forced their way in.

The communists who infiltrated our government intended to weaken us, send classified info. to the USSR, and use various means to impose their will.
Well, guess what? The Communists took control in Russia from an absolute monarchy that was toppled by revolution, they didn't force their way into a Democratic Republic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:06 AM
 
2,104 posts, read 1,443,163 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
It was on our coins well before the 50's.

It wasn't about McCarthy either but about moral superiority over the atheist communists.
Never said it wasn't, Mr. Straw Man. I also never claimed it was about him specifically, but it (when it became the OFFICIAL national motto) certainly happened when it happened for a reason. I think you know this.

"My own feeling in the matter is due to my very firm conviction that to put such a motto on coins, or to use it in any kindred manner, not only does no good but does positive harm, and is in effect irreverence, which comes dangerously close to sacrilege ... it seems to me eminently unwise to cheapen such a motto by use on coins, just as it would be to cheapen it by use on postage stamps, or in advertisements."

--Theodore Roosevelt, November 11, 1907
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:06 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post

YouTube - Ex-KGB Agent Bezmenov talks about demoralization

For starters.

You don't need a majority to destroy and takeover a country if you have the patience to do so.

As I said above, I don't care if someone is a communist, but I do not want them in a position where they can enslave us. As the old saying goes, you have a right to do anything that doesn't infringe on another's rights...and that's how I view this.
And how did McCarthy not infringe on the rights of Communists? And anyone else he cared to call to his committee? McCarthy was ALL about infringing on other people's rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:07 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,499,682 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by ♠atizar♠ View Post
*belly laugh*


I wish we could give rep for humor, even if unintentional.
Start here if you wish: Venona - NSA/CSS

The declassified soviet stuff gets even "better" if you care to research further...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:08 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,499,682 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Well, guess what? The Communists took control in Russia from an absolute monarchy that was toppled by revolution, they didn't force their way into a Democratic Republic.
No, Russia was a democratic republic by that point. The tsar was gone already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:09 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,499,682 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And how did McCarthy not infringe on the rights of Communists? And anyone else he cared to call to his committee? McCarthy was ALL about infringing on other people's rights.
But without stopping the communists, everyone would lose their rights. What to do? The communists quite intentionally used our freedoms against us to try to enslave us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:13 AM
 
2,104 posts, read 1,443,163 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Well guess what? The commies weren't exactly voted into power in Russia either. They forced their way in.

The communists who infiltrated our government intended to weaken us, send classified info. to the USSR, and use various means to impose their will.
Russia was ripe for a takeover. There were a whole string of events that allowed that to happen. And you know what else? They didn't have the same sort of government as we do when that took place. You know this though and are being thick for the sake of argument (I hope).

And you know what else? If communists want to live in this country, too bad. That's how it goes my friend. You don't get to pick one ideology that was WARPED by dictators and decide it should be outlawed. I can't think of anything more un-American than suppressing a group due to their beliefs, can you, Mr. LIBERTARIAN?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:16 AM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,384,859 times
Reputation: 10259
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You're a libertarian, aren't you, arctic? The people he attacked were Americans, many of whom weren't even active in the Communist Party in the 1950's because they saw what had happened in Russia. McCarthy was a political hack who engineered a "red scare" in order to gain power. He was a bully, and had no respect for the concept of honor.

How exactly were the communists going to gain control of our country? People complain all the time about how difficult it is for any political party besides Democrats and Republicans to gain traction in our country. We're a Democratic Republic, remember. They simply didn't have the numbers to influence our government even incrementally.

We're a country with the two largest oceans as our eastern and western borders, and friendly countries to the north and south, making us a very difficult country to invade, especially in the 1950's.

The "red scare" was a boogeyman, and the fact that people are still scared today by a non-credible threat is just sad.
There is nothing non-credible about government over-stepping itself and sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong.

Liberty is expensive and to be protected by the citizens AGAINST their own government.

No one thinks the Russians were about to invade but in the 1950’s there was plenty of plausible reason to think that our government was capable of overstepping and moving toward a communist dictatorship.

You forget the context of the time DC, which is odd for you because you are as reasonable a person as I have ever debated on this forum.

The men running the government had lived thru the FDR years. Please note that upon his death, America decided it was too dangerous to let a President have more than 2 terms as president.

These men had also seen in the 1930’s the FDR administration locking people up for doing things like lowering the price of their goods and services.

FDR had implemented things that were socialist leaning. There had been property rights issues as well and on top of that America in the 1950’s was in a death struggle with communists all over the world.

Add to that the rising nuclear threat. The world was a scary place and there really were Americans who wanted the Soviets to win.

McCarthy ended up over reaching and I suspect power did go to his head, but that doesn’t mean there weren’t really good reasons within the context of his time, to take a very hard stand against the infiltration of communists in our government.

As bad as McCarthy was, he never once had a free born American locked up for just wanting to operate an honest business. Franklin Roosevelt the darling of the left and a hero beyond scrutiny did exactly that more than once.

So don’t give me this schlock about McCarthy being a complete idiot. The truth is there is a great deal more nuance to the story than you are admitting here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:16 AM
 
2,104 posts, read 1,443,163 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
But without stopping the communists, everyone would lose their rights. What to do? The communists quite intentionally used our freedoms against us to try to enslave us.
Hurry up and move to Alaska already. You'll be safer from the Reds there I hear! Bring your laser disc of Red Dawn with you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Old 04-22-2010, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,224,629 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by ♠atizar♠ View Post
It was put on there in the 50s when the McCarthyists were running wild. They also forced their god into the Pledge of Allegiance, around that same era. You'd think that "In God We Trust" has been around since Revolutionary times though - listening to some conservatives.
You tell half the story. In god we trust was placed on american coins after the civil war. It was approved for Paper currency as you stated in the 50s
U.S. Treasury - Fact Sheet on the History of"In God We Trust"

So In God we trust has been around since the Civil war

The motto IN GOD WE TRUST was placed on United States coins largely because of the increased religious sentiment existing during the Civil War. Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase received many appeals from devout persons throughout the country, urging that the United States recognize the Deity on United States coins. From Treasury Department records, it appears that the first such appeal came in a letter dated November 13, 1861. It was written to Secretary Chase by Rev. M. R. Watkinson, Minister of the Gospel from Ridleyville, Pennsylvania, and read:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top