Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did he happen to mention just how that would be accomplished? Just what equipment would be necessary to convert a ship designed to carry oil to the task of removing it from ocean depths? Just how long it would take to equip them to do this? Or would that require just a few too many facts?
Uh-huh, this response was predictable.
The oil is ON THE SURFACE AND Below and I'm sure more in the deeper water making it's way to the surface.
Get your FACTS straight.
Haven't you seen the miles-long oil slick in the gulf?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Uh-huh, this response was predictable.
The oil is ON THE SURFACE AND Below and I'm sure more in the deeper water making it's way to the surface.
Get your FACTS straight.
Haven't you seen the miles-long oil slick in the gulf?
Geez.
Try getting your facts straight.
You still FAIL to describe exactly how transports would be re-equipped for recovery, THAT would be a little too fact based for your agenda, eh? Or did you just think they'd trot on down to Sears and buy a few ShopVacs
Same with the cries for more booms, from initial reports there just weren't enough available to contain a spill of this magnitude, have anything factual to contradict that?
What I know is despite all the whining you have yet to state specifically and factually exactly what plans and procedures were available yet not implemented.
Hilarious!
I just gave you two examples of what they are NOT doing.
Oh my, the deflection and spin is astounding.
But you don't have to believe me, just listen to the media and those honest lefties.
You still FAIL to describe exactly how transports would be re-equipped for recovery, THAT would be a little too fact based for your agenda, eh? Or did you just think they'd trot on down to Sears and buy a few ShopVacs
Same with the cries for more booms, from initial reports there just weren't enough available to contain a spill of this magnitude, have anything factual to contradict that?
They don't need to be re-equipped. This is exactly what these tankers are made for - suck it up.
WOW! Isn't it interesting, the NeoConfused, who traditionally pooh-pooh the green movement, are all of a sudden citing green web sites as gospel as well as AOL news which freely admits it could not verify a story?
WOW! Isn't it interesting, the NeoConfused, who traditionally pooh-pooh the green movement, are all of a sudden citing green web sites as gospel as well as AOL news which freely admits it could not verify a story?
Now, we know how important it is for obama to get that perfect photo op wherever he goes.
BP bused in 100s of temp workers for Obama visit, state official says - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2320 - broken link)
Well, it's cheaper than an aircraft carrier.
And if you want to use the backdrop, oil soaked beaches in the Gulf coast are still a helluva lot cheaper than the blood soaked sands of Iraq and Afghanistan. Have you been protesting those lately?
Wonder if these bused in people came from his favorite union goon squad or his favorite Acorn organization?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
