Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-19-2014, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
2,541 posts, read 5,480,219 times
Reputation: 2602

Advertisements

I lived in Fuquay when I first moved to the Triangle in 2000-2006. I was just doing a little real estate search in Fuquay and saw that the prices are still almost as low as they were in 2000. You can still get a decent starter home in the $110's-$120k's. Am I missing something? Or have property values really not increased much at all in this period? Do people think this is a good place to invest at this point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2014, 03:58 PM
 
637 posts, read 1,059,063 times
Reputation: 643
Part of what you're seeing is that at the low end of the market there is less appreciation. Also its possible you were looking at brand new starter homes at that range around 2000, and now perhaps those starter homes have seen some increase in land value, but 15 years later are looking at upcoming improvement needs (roof, HVAC, windows etc).

In anything less than a perfectly predictable / stable real estate market (if one ever existed), in major metro areas we sometimes see a trend in the smaller towns surrounding major cities that is a chain reaction of suburban sprawl. It goes like this:

Due to cost of homes in primary city, smaller surrounding towns gain in popularity due to newer construction, more house for the money, smaller town feel, etc. folks buy in new surrounding town suburbs in droves with hopes of future growth (which are reasonable expectations based on projections at time of purchase). Small town is chosen based on buyer's current job location / commute at the time. Economic downtimes hit, causing many in the small town to lose jobs and pursue employment elsewhere, but the impacted job market often finds the homeowner looking at a much worse commute to a new job than they thought they were signing up for. So, either they sell in a down market for less than they would have liked, impacting local property values, or if things are really bad they end up foreclosing (also impacting property values for the entire area). Meanwhile the older homes in or closer to the primary city in question fare much better.

So I think what you're seeing is partly because the suburban sprawl syndrome but also a factor of the price range you're looking in. I'm not that familiar with the Fuquay market but it looks like in general homes have returned to about their peak 2007 values (returning to values of 7 years prior isn't exactly ideal but it's better than a continued downward trend).

In terms of buying property, I've always gotten the most bang for the buck (return on resale) in homes that are valued near the area median range. Starter homes that are far below average cost, and McMansions that are much larger / more expensive than average always have their necks on the chopping block when the RE market is less than perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 04:46 PM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,288,569 times
Reputation: 26568
What about larger homes that are NOT McMansions?

That word gets tossed around pretty often on here. All larger homes are not McMansions.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 05:09 PM
 
637 posts, read 1,059,063 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
What about larger homes that are NOT McMansions?

That word gets tossed around pretty often on here. All larger homes are not McMansions.
That's why I qualified it with "slash more expensive". I was hoping it would be obvious that the price of the home versus median for the area is what matters most. Square footage can matter too but typically in RE size and price go hand-in-hand to a certain extent.

The point is too much below or too much above median home price tends to add additional risk factor to resale, just as distance of commute from core job area can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top