Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2009, 11:48 AM
 
106,680 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164

Advertisements

Lumber hit the daily limit in the futures markets today... it rose so much trading was halted

the small up trend in activity in the housing market has actually got certain building related commodities starting to spike upward in advance of things happening.

could it be reacting to things we dont even see yet? or just anticipating something thats still pretty far off....
if only we knew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2009, 11:50 AM
 
5,252 posts, read 4,677,849 times
Reputation: 17362
Dropping home prices are just the beginning of a contraction of the wayyy overblown US economy. In the past, home prices were a reflection of the ongoing good or not so good employment stats, in the case of todays market that hasn't changed.

Yes, there is some activity in US GDP and that could be accepted as evidence of some kind of recovery, but only when that activity comes from a resurgence of hiring and buying, it won't count for beans if the money is coming from government bailouts. We all know that the infusion of trillions of dollars in a fourteen trillion dollar economy is going to show up in some market metrics as an improvement, but, the truth is coming to the fore in those honest unemployment figures.

Government spending in a more direct handoff to the mass consumer base would have made for a much faster recovery, but then again, how would that have benefitted those on Wall Street, you know, those folk's who REALLY run America..........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 12:32 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
756 posts, read 1,654,218 times
Reputation: 289
Quotes from an article in the Arizona Republic (my emphases):
azcentral.com - members


Things are beginning to look up in Arizona as they are for the nation. Still the Phoenix housing market is nowhere near a return to health.”


Metropolitan Phoenix's home prices are now above their lows.

Home building in the Valley will increase in 2010.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 12:36 PM
 
106,680 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
MY sister is in north mesa and although there is sooooo much for sale, homes have stabilized a bit after a huge drop the last 2 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 12:41 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
756 posts, read 1,654,218 times
Reputation: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
MY sister is in north mesa and although there is sooooo much for sale, homes have stabilized a bit after a huge drop the last 2 years.
I'm in North Mesa, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, MD
553 posts, read 1,707,587 times
Reputation: 400
When Obama said it was maybe a good time to buy stocks in March 09, within a couple days the DOW and S&P began their historic moonshot rally.

Today, well, he's basically telegraphing the economy will contract:

President Obama cautions against double-dip recession - BloggingStocks

I don't question any one individual's decision to buy a home. But in aggregate, and I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, there is no way home prices can rise let alone stop falling until we stop bleeding jobs and foreclosures slow. And since the government must begin withdrawing the massive amounts of liquidity in our economy, even Obama knows we can't have a get healthy until the economy can operate without life support.

Any data points giving optimism are being spun as positive and are only temporary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 01:06 PM
 
106,680 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
as i said many times its not home prices that may rise so fast, its those mortage rates that can shoot up on a dime.

the fed is fighting to hold them artificially low but its been harder and harder as world investor pressure has been pushing them upward.

they went from low 4's to high 4's low 5's.....

1% jump in rates on a 400,000 mortgage is the same jump in monthly costs as if the house jumped 10% to 440,000 and now you had to take a 440,000 mortgage instead......

Last edited by mathjak107; 11-18-2009 at 01:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 02:02 PM
 
132 posts, read 347,027 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
as i said many times its not home prices that may rise so fast, its those mortage rates that can shoot up on a dime.

the fed is fighting to hold them artificially low but its been harder and harder as world investor pressure has been pushing them upward.

they went from low 4's to high 4's low 5's.....

1% jump in rates on a 400,000 mortgage is the same jump in monthly costs as if the house jumped 10% to 440,000 and now you had to take a 440,000 mortgage instead......
But doesn't a rise in rates reduce the value of property accordingly, all things considered? Won't it will destroy any recovery in the RE market at this point in time?

Here's a scenario:
I am looking to buy a home valued at $400,000 today at 5%. Disregard a downpayment to keep the numbers simple.

So I only qualify for a maximum $400,000 mortgage.
Then I wait a period (let's say 12 months) and during this time rates rise to 6%.
Now I can only qualify for a $360,000 mortgage at 6% due to the rate increase. Isn't that same home valued previously at $400,000 now really worth just $360,000?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 02:21 PM
 
106,680 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
FIRST OFF MARKETS HAVE NO MEMORY, they are only worth what they are worth at the moment , not what was.
Dont assume because rates rise that prices will fall, thats like saying because rates just fell to historical lows prices should have rose or soared... there are so many other factors that are involved including human emotions, fear, greed and perceptions of whats next.

the truth is we are so far below the historical average of around 7% that 6% to 7% is still a normal deal under normal times, most of our real estate growth periods have been even higher. i jumped into a booming market at 8-1/4 in 1987.


once rates kick up you can have all those potential buyers still on the fence have human emotion take over and decide we better buy now before rates go even higher and we can afford even less house on our budget.

the fact that once rates rise even a point alot of people have to buy a cheaper home now and that could put pressure on prices of lower end homes..

now one can predict but it holds just as much of an argument as any other outlook

Last edited by mathjak107; 11-18-2009 at 02:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 02:22 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,204,742 times
Reputation: 2357
Quote:
Originally Posted by stosh View Post
But doesn't a rise in rates reduce the value of property accordingly, all things considered? Won't it will destroy any recovery in the RE market at this point in time?

Here's a scenario:
I am looking to buy a home valued at $400,000 today at 5%. Disregard a downpayment to keep the numbers simple.

So I only qualify for a maximum $400,000 mortgage.
Then I wait a period (let's say 12 months) and during this time rates rise to 6%.
Now I can only qualify for a $360,000 mortgage at 6% due to the rate increase. Isn't that same home valued previously at $400,000 now really worth just $360,000?
It may mean a lot of thing! People associate price to just interest rate. That's just one part. Let's see from supply and demand side, shall we?

If there are more supply than that can be taken in a years time, the 400K house will wait for you at 360K (to use your number) Now the sellers has waited a year and see nobody is touching their property. If not, it would be a 320K house that's going to wait for you at 360K (again just using your number) because now sellers have seen that house are closing in no time.

In a years time your earning power could increase and buy the 400K and you would say " I did it because I can afford it NOW." That's why in the long run people income and house appreciating has to be in line. Otherwise, well we know what has just happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top