Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm only talking about American women and the statistics as I have seen them in this country.
Over 2/3 of people are overweight, I'm not going to be with someone that has let themselves go like that. I've eliminated roughly 70% of the population without knowing anything about them. Then I need to be attracted to them, so lets say that's 40% of the remaining fit people are at least somewhat attractive, now we're down to 12% of all women based only on looks.
Fortunately I'm not a stickler for common interests or minutia like that, as long as she's nice and likes me I'll adapt and learn from the things she's interested in. So maybe 1/3 of women have the kind of personality traits I'm looking for with varying degrees of similar interests. Assuming their looks are random in relation to their personality, (realistically they're not as I've noticed overweight people tend to be bitter), then I could see myself dating somewhere around 4-5% of women given the opportunity.
Of that 4% they need to be single, attracted to me, and have similar goals for the relationship before its going to be long term. I have no idea how common that is, I've only had LTR with 2 women out of all the women I've ever interacted with.
Last edited by Skinnyfat; 01-04-2014 at 09:49 AM..
The less than 4% (with a fluctuating rate of 1% up or down based on circumstances, current geography of Sky-O habitat, age and state of life)
Brunette
Comfortable with her sexuality - Be willing to have porn induced marathon sex (without being too sl utty about things)
Must have a working relationship with reality
No kids
Must be into extreme sports and/or enjoy filming my landings from 12,000 feet
Dark, almost empty eyes: as if she is devoid of a soul (that's hot)
Killer curves
Has to tolerate that my dog is the official sidekick of the Sky-O and accept him
and a few more: but basically that brings the percentage down to 4% or less on average.
Dude, you're at like a fraction of a percent if you've got that specific of criteria and you want her to be attractive.
I have never dated someone who fits my 10 item short list. You can fall in love with someone and not be compatible or be compatible and not be in love, along with any other combination, so on paper its probably 0.1%. In reality everyone compromises and I'm no different so 1% is probably a more realistic %.
Over 2/3 of people are overweight, I'm not going to be with someone that has let themselves go like that. I've eliminated roughly 70% of the population without knowing anything about them. Then I need to be attracted to them, so lets say that's 40% of the remaining fit people are at least somewhat attractive, now we're down to 12% of all women based only on looks.
Oh my gosh I forgot about the overweight people! I change my percentage to 0.5%.
Meaning: good career, tall, attractive, great shape, intelligent, educated, open-minded, funny, and not a womanizer
Oh, *whew* Well, at least you don't care about things like integrity, intelligence, kindness, a good heart, mutual respect, and all that. That would narrow down your field even further!
All good criteria. I'll add Healthy, physical attraction, Shared goals, compatibility, mischievous, desire to have 3some with Jessica Alba.
There are a lot of cool people out there, but not too many who I wouldn't tire of after awhile.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.