Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-31-2014, 05:27 PM
 
15,013 posts, read 21,663,909 times
Reputation: 12334

Advertisements

The Triangular Theory of Love



I've always liked this theory. Here's short description of what makes up the 3 components of consummate love:

  1. Intimacy – Which encompasses feelings of attachment, closeness, connectedness, and bondedness.
  2. Passion – Which encompasses drives connected to both limerence and sexual attraction.
  3. Commitment – Which encompasses, in the short term, the decision to remain with another, and in the long term, plans made with that other.

If you want more description, here's the longer link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangular_theory_of_love

So, which component(s) was/is missing in your current or failed relationship?

In my marriage, it was intimacy that was missing.

(PS- sorry the picture is so big)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:19 PM
 
2,087 posts, read 2,850,935 times
Reputation: 1561
None of it.

What was missing was things like either respect/support, compatibility of personality, or compatibility of demeanor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:21 PM
 
15,013 posts, read 21,663,909 times
Reputation: 12334
If you stretch your mind, everything could fall into one of those 3 categories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:40 PM
 
867 posts, read 909,876 times
Reputation: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by srjth View Post
The Triangular Theory of Love



(PS- sorry the picture is so big)
I like this theory. Let's see, I had to look up Fatuous Love because the concept was odd to me. The wikipedia article described it as jumping into marriage because of the passion. So, I would toss in a lot of celebrities into this category. I've never experienced it, thankfully. I've experienced Romantic love with varying degrees of passion and intimacy. I would say my first love was in the high passion modest intimacy but no commitment on either of our parts. Everything after that has been some passion and some intimacy but the commitment angle has always been off. So, I would say for me commitment has been off but, but, but I don't plan on having children so that might be the reason why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:41 PM
 
867 posts, read 909,876 times
Reputation: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJS99 View Post
None of it.

What was missing was things like either respect/support, compatibility of personality, or compatibility of demeanor.
I think that all falls into intimacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:42 PM
 
19,969 posts, read 30,241,153 times
Reputation: 40047
being a triangle with three points,,is this a threesome?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Midwest
706 posts, read 1,205,976 times
Reputation: 880
Quote:
Originally Posted by srjth View Post
If you stretch your mind, everything could fall into one of those 3 categories.
A bit of all of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:46 PM
 
15,013 posts, read 21,663,909 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by mainebrokerman View Post
being a triangle with three points,,is this a threesome?
Nope, it's my serious post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artifice32 View Post
I think that all falls into intimacy.
I agree, but I didn't want to say. People are so touchy around here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:51 PM
 
Location: I'm not lost, I'm exploring!
3,401 posts, read 13,375,213 times
Reputation: 5774
Your triangle logic is flawed. Mine was missing trust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 06:53 PM
 
15,013 posts, read 21,663,909 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marylandkitten View Post
Your triangle logic is flawed. Mine was missing trust.
Trust is in the intimacy part. (you have to read the article links to get that)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top