Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's just on background. You know - scientific research. You never know when you'll run into some female with that affliction, and since you DON'T have this complex, by reading this article you'll be prepared to deal with her.
You haven't proved that ALL women prefer tall men. The key word is ALL. Until you can prove that, your argument means nothing. You haven't backed up your argument. The majority and all are not synonomous.
Try again.
Change the words to "overwhelming majority", as the links I provided prove, and you might have a point.
Yes. It says that I am 5'3, balding, and not very good looking, hence, unattracitve, which I readily admit, as those things are facts. The links I provided on the other message proves that.
Change the words to "overwhelming majority", as the links I provided prove, and you might have a point.
Bottom line: You haven't proven your argument to be true. You said yourself that ALL WOMEN prefer tall men. PROVE IT. Until you can, your argument means nothing.
And overwhelming majority isn't synonomous with ALL. Therefore, your argument is false.
Yes. It says that I am 5'3, balding, and not very good looking, hence, unattracitve, which I readily admit, as those things are facts. The links I provided on the other message proves that.
No, it says something about your lack of confidence and your lack of actual experience in the dating field. Somebody will always be attractive to somebody else. That doesn't apply to just one gender either.
No, it says something about your lack of confidence and your lack of actual experience in the dating field. Somebody will always be attractive to somebody else. That doesn't apply to just one gender either.
For an atheist, you certaintly are not scientific and rational in your thinking. Like the scientific studies in the links I provided prove, the chances of a GOOD LOOKING man at 5'3 for being attractive is slim, let alone and unnatrractive man at 5'3.
Is it a 100& guarantee? No. But neither is the notion that fire breathing dragons do not exist. Like the fire breathing dragon, the female who is sexually attracted to a short and unnattractive man is something that, the existince of which cannot be thoroughly proven or disproven. However, just as I will not hold my breath at the prospect of seeing and being eaten by a fire breathing dragon, I will not hold my breath at the prospect of meeting someone who finds me attractive.
Also, just as it would most likely not be profitable to hunt fire breathing dragons, it would most likely not be a fruitful endeavor to attemp to find a female who finds me attractive.
This process is called "logic" and it is one that I would think an atheist would be more fimiliar with.
For an atheist, you certaintly are not scientific and rational in your thinking. Like the scientific studies in the links I provided prove, the chances of a GOOD LOOKING man at 5'3 for being attractive is slim, let alone and unnatrractive man at 5'3.
Is it a 100& guarantee? No. But neither is the notion that fire breathing dragons do not exist. Like the fire breathing dragon, the female who is sexually attracted to a short and unnattractive man is something that, the existince of which cannot be thoroughly proven or disproven. However, just as I will not hold my breath at the prospect of seeing and being eaten by a fire breathing dragon, I will not hold my breath at the prospect of meeting someone who finds me attractive.
Also, just as it would most likely not be profitable to hunt fire breathing dragons, it would most likely not be a fruitful endeavor to attemp to find a female who finds me attractive.
This process is called "logic" and it is one that I would think an atheist would be more fimiliar with.
I'm very logical. See if you can follow this logic.
The overwhelming majority and all are not synonomous.
Therefore, there are women out there who either don't care about height or prefer men who are their height or shorter.
Insinuate: 2. To introduce or insert (oneself) by subtle and artful means.
This is starting to feel like "Groundhog Day"...
So you're insinuating that I implied your insinuations were implicitly introduced in the idiom of illicit integrations?
Quote:
And I have no idea what the hell you are saying in the second part of this message.
That's a shame - I spent a lot of time trying to be clever.
You implicitly implied that I was of the female persuasion - I merely reiterated that your individualistic cause-and-effect mechanisms would be activated by this ideation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
