Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL - not particularly. Just that she's a convenient, pretty toy to play with when the mood strikes.
EEeeeewwww, gross . My first thought is, maybe he's gay? Maybe he really doesn't like the companionship of women. Its not uncommon for gay men to marry women.
EEeeeewwww, gross . My first thought is, maybe he's gay? Maybe he really doesn't like the companionship of women. Its not uncommon for gay men to marry women.
Sounds like my RC car. But I always get carried away with it and it gets out of range and dumped into a lake. Sorry...I'm still imaging a sneaky person breaking into TVSG's room and tickling him.
I just hope my friend never gets out of range, only to find herself dumped in a lake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllAboutEve
My first thought is, maybe he's gay?
I really don't think so. Last I heard, though, they were sleeping in separate rooms. Up until that point, I think the frequency of intimate contact negates the idea of him being gay.
I really don't think so. Last I heard, though, they were sleeping in separate rooms. Up until that point, I think the frequency of intimate contact negates the idea of him being gay.
Just because he's having sex with her does not mean he's not gay.
Maybe he's one of those older generation males who thinks women should perform their wifely duties and otherwise stay out of the way. There are pigs like that out there, unfortunately.
Maybe he's one of those older generation males who thinks women should perform their wifely duties and otherwise stay out of the way. There are pigs like that out there, unfortunately.
Oh, let's see...he's something like 55 or 56, she's 53. Remember, though, they DID agree to the Pig Contract before getting hitched...it's just now she's getting tired of it, and the level of detachment / viciousness seems to have been cranked up to a new level.
I have never had this particular type of deal, but I have been put on the shelf, so to speak. Good enough to tie me down, have me on his arm in some situations or when he wanted other men to know I was taken, good enough for the intimacy, good enough to be with when he wanted me there on his schedule. But he kept me separate from his kids and kept me a secret from his ex wife with the excuse that the kids weren't ready for a new woman in his life and it was none of the ex's business that he had a girlfriend. I felt used, it sucked. I left him.
Sounds to me like this is more of a sugardaddy-ish arrangement. She represents a clean home, a home cooked meal, sex when he wants it - she serves a purpose. She is an extention of him, not an individual entitled to having her needs met. She may have been okay with it when they started out, but people evolve. Sounds like the trade-off has lost it's luster.
I can't imagine any verbal agreement that would force someone to stay in an unhappy relationship being binding.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.