Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2010, 06:05 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 4,012,342 times
Reputation: 733

Advertisements

mahalo.
i have a very loose understanding about the pre-adamic world-view.
originally i was told the term originated with the southern slave owners. as it goes, from time to time some of the slave owners would question the act of human slavery. in response, the brotherhood and/or southern ministers would instruct the ambivalent owners that ownership of the slaves was not wrong because these people were before Adam and of course Adam was the first man so anything before Adam wasn't human. after hearing this explanation i thought the term was limited to the southern U.S.A.
i was surprised and oddly pleased when recently i found out the R.C.C. acknowledges the history of pre-adamites.
CNS STORY: God made pre-humans into people, Vatican newspaper says
the Pope says God created the pre-adamites and God upgraded them.
the foremost point for me was taken from the release was that the Pope acknowledges there was such a thing as a pre-adamite.
knowing now that the Vatican acknowledges the pre-adamic philosphy i'am really wanting to know more.

i was curious as to if there were any posters here that could/would elaborate on thier knowledge of the pre-adamite philosphy.
thanx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2010, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Earth. For now.
1,289 posts, read 2,126,332 times
Reputation: 1567
"Pre-Adamite" means Adam wasn't first.

Which means the Bible is wrong.

Therefore, ignore the Bible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 06:24 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 4,012,342 times
Reputation: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astron1000 View Post
"Pre-Adamite" means Adam wasn't first.

Which means the Bible is wrong.

Therefore, ignore the Bible.
simplier said than done.

Last edited by gabfest; 11-28-2010 at 06:27 PM.. Reason: msp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
964 posts, read 2,648,216 times
Reputation: 578
It must be impossible since adam was the first man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:29 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Wow! Ya gotta love the Catholic Church's never ending love for having its cake and eating it too.

Ok, children, the evidence of evolution is way too strong for the scholarly Catholic Church to deny any longer... but there's still time to put our little ecclesiastical spin on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:44 PM
 
Location: NC, USA
7,084 posts, read 14,864,701 times
Reputation: 4041
when you hear the term "pre-adamites" what comes to mind?

Nothing. Since I do not believe in the whole "Adam and Eve" mythology why would I care what came before this mythology existed? OR......I could figure that those folks were pretty danged bored to come up with such outlandish stories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:47 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,038 times
Reputation: 1775
Greek Myths still hold that Pandora was the first woman, while the Norse are thinking it was Ask and Embla. Still, it's nice to see the Vatican is updating the Hebrew myths, for those that are interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Golden, CO
2,108 posts, read 2,894,838 times
Reputation: 1027
When I was a Mormon, some scholars of a scientific bent would try to reconcile evolution with Mormon doctrine. Some thought that perhaps humankind did evolve from ape-type ancestors, eventually something we would recognize as a modern human was born. This would be Genesis's "6th day" (day not meaning 24 hours, but more like an era). God placed into this being, the soul of a man, and thus it became the first man, Adam.

It should go without saying, I don't believe any of this now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Santa FE NM
3,490 posts, read 6,511,972 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
when you hear the term "pre-adamites" what comes to mind?
Spell-check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:08 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 4,012,342 times
Reputation: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighteyes View Post
Spell-check.
i'am .
"pre-adamites" is a valid term
CatholicReference.net : Catholic Dictionary : PRE-ADAMITES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top