Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:00 AM
 
28,163 posts, read 25,322,169 times
Reputation: 16665

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoegal111 View Post
You are trying to use situational ethics, and poorly I'll add, to justify something that cannot be justified.

I'm done with the civics lessons for the day. I'll make the same suggestion to you that I made to CHS89, if you missed it in your civics class the first time around then I suggest you go back for a refresher or consult an attorney.

If anyone else would like to discuss this without talking down to others, that would be great.

 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:02 AM
 
947 posts, read 1,644,259 times
Reputation: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
If anyone else would like to discuss this without talking down to others, that would be great.
But it's seems to be perfectly okay for others to talk down or patronize me?
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:03 AM
 
Location: NE PA
7,931 posts, read 15,827,904 times
Reputation: 4425
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoegal111 View Post
You are trying to use situational ethics, and poorly I'll add, to justify something that cannot be justified.

I'm done with the civics lessons for the day. I'll make the same suggestion to you that I made to CHS89, if you missed it in your civics class the first time around then I suggest you go back for a refresher or consult an attorney.
Actually I did pretty well in Civics, thank you very much. But if I'm going to teach a class, it would be Common Sense 101. That must be you falling asleep in the back of the class.
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:04 AM
 
947 posts, read 1,644,259 times
Reputation: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
So, it's ok for the KKK to publicly threaten blacks, but NOT ok for the courthouse to have a nativity scene and menorah?

Why don't the minority groups simply ASK the courthouse to display their symbols of faith? Shouldn't diversity RECOGNIZE different faiths instead of STIFLING them?
If they threaten anyone it's not considered peaceful assembly and therefore not protected speech.
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Hanover , Virginia
331 posts, read 640,209 times
Reputation: 231
You do realize that the nativity scene isn't really a display for all Christians, right? There are many protestant Christians (especially American sects) who view the nativity scene as idolatry and blasphemous. Also, Hanukkah is a minor Jewish holiday, so the inclusion of the menorah just seems to be "hey we're down with you too, we swear!"

Whether you like it or not, it doesn't belong in STATE-run areas. if you want to put up nativity scenes in your own yard, feel free. Don't expect the state to do it for you.

If you were in an area that was majority muslims, I'm sure you would freak out at the sight of a crescent in the courthouse area.
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:07 AM
 
Location: NE PA
7,931 posts, read 15,827,904 times
Reputation: 4425
Quote:
Originally Posted by marchawg View Post

If you were in an area that was majority muslims, I'm sure you would freak out at the sight of a crescent in the courthouse area.
No...if the area was majority Muslim and that was the prevailing culture of the area, I would expect it.
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:07 AM
 
28,163 posts, read 25,322,169 times
Reputation: 16665
Actually I wouldn't marchawg.
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Location: Location
6,727 posts, read 9,959,151 times
Reputation: 20483
I think the adults among us are well-aware of the rulings of the Supreme Court, but that doesn't mean we are in agreement...The First Amendment was meant to prevent the institution of a government religion which all citizens must follow...Unfortunately, Mr. Jefferson didn't foresee his simple language to be open to interpretation by later generations...
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Hanover , Virginia
331 posts, read 640,209 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
So, it's ok for the KKK to publicly threaten blacks, but NOT ok for the courthouse to have a nativity scene and menorah?

Why don't the minority groups simply ASK the courthouse to display their symbols of faith? Shouldn't diversity RECOGNIZE different faiths instead of STIFLING them?
The KKK has nothing to do with this. Do you know what a red herring is?
 
Old 12-17-2009, 09:08 AM
 
Location: NE PA
7,931 posts, read 15,827,904 times
Reputation: 4425
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoegal111 View Post
If they threaten anyone it's not considered peaceful assembly and therefore not protected speech.
Pretty much the entire purpose of KKK rallies is to intimidate racial minorities.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top