For athesist and agnostics: What would constitute proof of God?

[jeffbase40]

Originally Posted by Nozzferrahhtoo

Except you are. Two of them now.



That is just you being paranoid. I care not for what other posters do to you or with you here. I am just wondering if you will be replying to my posts or continuing to dodge them.



Ah so not only are you dodging them but you are disparaging them without replying to them. Throw away comments like that are something that anyone can write. If they are so weak then by all means reply to them and rebut the points I make.

Simply calling my points weak and then retreating and running away demeans you more than me.

That's because I'm too busy sweeping up all the dust and ashes that accumulates from crushing your arguments.

No seriously, it's pretty simple. If you disagree with me, just make your counterargument instead of ego talk about how I am so ignorant. Your rhetoric about how I am dodging is wasteful and tiresome. No need to be rude about it.

[Nozzferrahhtoo]

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

That's because I'm too busy sweeping up all the dust and ashes that accumulates from crushing your arguments.

Except you have done no such thing. Anywhere. Ever. You appear to come from the same camp as the user GldnRule who spends more time talking about how victorious his posts are than actually writing anything of substance.

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

No seriously, it's pretty simple. If you disagree with me, just make your counterargument

I did. Twice. And you have dodged both posts now. All I am doing is asking you if you intend to reply to them or should I stop asking and move on? There is no need to be so rude about it.

[jeffbase40]

Originally Posted by Nozzferrahhtoo

Except you have done no such thing. Anywhere. Ever. You appear to come from the same camp as the user GldnRule who spends more time talking about how victorious his posts are than actually writing anything of substance.

Like you would ever admit defeat. lol

Originally Posted by Nozzferrahhtoo

I did. Twice. And you have dodged both posts now. All I am doing is asking you if you intend to reply to them or should I stop asking and move on? There is no need to be so rude about it.

Can we stop with the juvenile "dodging" taunts now? I've had to go back like 7 pages to find a non-taunt post of yours, and it was just a nonsense comparison of religion to the common cold or a penis. You think just finding an example that has some element of similarity is a solid counter-argument. Very weak. There are different reasons why man has failed to destroy the common cold vs man's attempt to destroy the Bible. Apple and oranges.

[Nozzferrahhtoo]

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

Like you would ever admit defeat.

Have done on many occasions, but this is not about me. This is about "For athesist and agnostics: What would constitute proof of God?" and whether or not you intend to reply to my posts on the thread topic. do you or do you not? Its a simple question.

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

Can we stop with the juvenile "dodging" taunts now? I've had to go back like 7 pages to find a non-taunt post of yours

I will stop bringing it up when you stop doing it. Perhaps while going back some pages however you might choose to reply to my posts on the topic? Or would you like me to repost them for you?

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

and it was just a nonsense comparison of religion to the common cold or a penis. You think just finding an example that has some element of similarity is a solid counter-argument. Very weak.

Not what I did at all. So what is "very weak" is your attempt to misrepresent my post in an attempt to dodge replying to that post. The analogy was not my argument. The analogy was a part of a separate argument which I went into at length. If you do not like the analogy then ignore it and reply to the point being made. Alas you are focusing on the analogy to dodge the argument.