Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When atheists and skeptics make accusations that there were no mentions of certain "what's" on the Ark, they only show that they lack knowledge of ancient languages and histories.
A recent poster wants to set up a strawman claiming that there is no mention of a "kangaroo" on the ark or in ancient middle east history -and so on and so forth, but the argument is silly, as they haven't even a clue as to what the animal would have been called.
kangaroo is not the name of the animal, but an English invention. It was called "mee-nuah" by the Aussie natives in at least one tribe's language.
Let those skeptics who want to set up their strawmen first prove that they know all the mixed tongue names for the animals they want to prove could not have possibly been on the ark, first.
Actually, why do they even want to try to make strawman arguments to claim they knock down, anyway, when they don't even believe that there was a world wide deluge to consume sin on the earth for the first time, as ancient records say?
I guess they are just looking to pat themselves on the backs as if their strawmen are wonderful genius's who can challenge God Himself.
When atheists and skeptics make accusations that there were no mentions of certain "what's" on the Ark, they only show that they lack knowledge of ancient languages and histories.
A recent poster wants to set up a strawman claiming that there is no mention of a "kangaroo" on the ark or in ancient middle east history -and so on and so forth, but the argument is silly, as they haven't even a clue as to what the animal would have been called.
kangaroo is not the name of the animal, but an English invention. It was called "mee-nuah" by the Aussie natives in at least one tribe's language.
Let those skeptics who want to set up their strawmen first prove that they know all the mixed tongue names for the animals they want to prove could not have possibly been on the ark, first.
Actually, why do they even want to try to make strawman arguments to claim they knock down, anyway, when they don't even believe that there was a world wide deluge to consume sin on the earth for the first time, as ancient records say?
I guess they are just looking to pat themselves on the backs as if their strawmen are wonderful genius's who can challenge God Himself.
i think that other poster made a good point about all the different tribes and cultures that continued on,-maybe Noah did build a boat and there was a flood but i dont think it was on the scale that the bible literast's think-think about it all the native americans ,all the african tribes,All the Indian religios cultures that hav been around for thousands and thousands of years-all of this would have been wiped from history,how could Noah and his family have populated the whole earth,and all the different races.
It was a big boat, three stories high, and longer than a football field, and only the young of those beast and fowl who were living souls and breathed the "breath of life" needed to be on the ark, with their food supply.
God took care of the rest.
Also there are variations of kinds, but the parent stock, only were on the ark. There were seven pair of clean and one pair of the unclean [earth cleaners are called the unclean], and only the young were on the ark.
It was a big boat, three stories high, and longer than a football field, and only the young of those beast and fowl who were living souls and breathed the "breath of life" needed to be on the ark, with their food supply.
God took care of the rest.
Also there are variations of kinds, but the parent stock, only were on the ark. There were seven pair of clean and one pair of the unclean [earth cleaners are called the unclean], and only the young were on the ark.
If you are going to start a thread as a rebuttal to mine,you should at least take the time to understand what I was asking.Nobody,repeat,nobody,has asked about the name Kangaroo in any language.You are so far off base here it is silly.My question was not WHY they weren't listed,or in whay language,but HOW they got from Australia to the Middle East across the ocean.
how could Noah and his family have populated the whole earth,and all the different races.
Biblically speaking, there are only two human being "races": the Adam race [the one old man] and the Israel race [the one New Man].
Jesus the Christ is come in flesh as the Firstborn of the One New Man race called "Israel". Jacob received the invocation of the name of the one New Man race of human beings [which was to to come and which is come], from the LORD of hosts Himself, as a sign of the adoption into His name which was to come by the Atonement for the souls of the Adam race so they could be regenerated in Spirit and then in body, into the image of the One New Man.
Every tribe on earth is from Noah by his three sons. In the book of 1 Enoch, we learn that Noah was white, Cush was black, Japheth was white, and Shem was red. From those three spring all the tribes of the earth, in the many variations of melanine amounts. Red, black, and white, and mixed variations of them all are not exclusive to the three sons of Noah, because before the tower of Babel rebellion and subsequent scattering of the tribes over the dividing and dived land mass, there was no isolation of genes, and everyone got different colored offspring, just as Adam ...and Noah did, and as parents also do today - BBC NEWS | UK | England | Black and white twins born
And these parents have two sets of black and white twins http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...cond-time.html
Abraham was red, Sarah white, Keturah black. Abraham and Keturah's descendants who settled eastward, in India, were black, and not from Cush, as most Africans are.
There were black Chinese in China, as history records, and they lost a war, traveled over the Pacific, and settled in Mexico, and are called the Olmecs, today.
If you are going to start a thread as a rebuttal to mine,you should at least take the time to understand what I was asking.Nobody,repeat,nobody,has asked about the name Kangaroo in any language.You are so far off base here it is silly.My question was not WHY they weren't listed,or in whay language,but HOW they got from Australia to the Middle East across the ocean.
Now that I have explained it,care to answer?
How did the oceans get between them and the land masses they were on?
Explain that one, if you can.
But as to history and facts of what was where, when, you set yourself up as an expert and you are not. You don't know where they were, what they were called, or where they are, because you have not gone over all the earth, in all the areas of the world, and looked for them yourself. You have no idea what they were called in Israel, Turkey, or any other place.
There were lions in Israel in the days of David. Where are they now?
We know there were lions and we know what their names were called in Hebrew, because they were not extinct there until a few hundred years ago. If they had become extinct longer ago, you would be claiming they weren't on the ark, either!
You don't know what mee-nuah were called in Hebrew, and you have a limited amount of historical writings at present, to discover that fact, because the libraries of the ancients were destroyed by invaders, long ago, which held the writings of the world in them, from ancient times.
Do you know what Yemim are? The Hebrew word means "terrors", but do you know how some were described in the ancient records? -nope!
Do you know what keephas were or are, or what the ducheephath is or was? -nope! the information is presently lost to us, and so it is with what is now called Kangaroo. You have no idea where it lived, what it was called in the mixed tongues, or where it even still lives or may live, because there are reports of wild ones seen in the USA, and there have ben for many long years. -How do you know what name the indians of different tribes called them?
You don't know.
Biblically speaking, there are only two human being "races": the Adam race [the one old man] and the Israel race [the one New Man].
Jesus the Christ is come in flesh as the Firstborn of the One New Man race called "Israel". Jacob received the invocation of the name of the one New Man race of human beings [which was to to come and which is come], from the LORD of hosts Himself, as a sign of the adoption into His name which was to come by the Atonement for the souls of the Adam race so they could be regenerated in Spirit and then in body, into the image of the One New Man.
Every tribe on earth is from Noah by his three sons. In the book of 1 Enoch, we learn that Noah was white, Cush was black, Japheth was white, and Shem was red. From those three spring all the tribes of the earth, in the many variations of melanine amounts. Red, black, and white, and mixed variations of them all are not exclusive to the three sons of Noah, because before the tower of Babel rebellion and subsequent scattering of the tribes over the dividing and dived land mass, there was no isolation of genes, and everyone got different colored offspring, just as Adam ...and Noah did, and as parents also do today - BBC NEWS | UK | England | Black and white twins born
And these parents have two sets of black and white twins Mixed-race couple give birth to black and white twins - for the second time | Mail Online
Abraham was red, Sarah white, Keturah black. Abraham and Keturah's descendants who settled eastward, in India, were black, and not from Cush, as most Africans are.
There were black Chinese in China, as history records, and they lost a war, traveled over the Pacific, and settled in Mexico, and are called the Olmecs, today.
how many years ago was this meant to happen???-and if they were all from the same culture then how come their are so many different tribal cultures -wouldnt they have carried on their culture.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
