Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Retired Brands
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2010, 04:00 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,689,401 times
Reputation: 3868

Advertisements

It seemed that when it came to mid sized and full sized cars in the 72-74 model era, GM and Ford were kind of tied with respect to popularity, whereas there were less fans of say Satellites/Coronets/Furies/Monacos/Polaras/Newports/New Yorkers/Imps and even less fans of Matadors and Ambassadors

And even Consumer reports tests of those cars during the 72-74 model years also paralelled the public's views--GM cars and Ford/Mercury usually were rated ahead of Mopars/AMC's in comparative tests

Do you consider the above mentioned Mopars as being closer to AMC's, or closer to GM/Ford, or in a class by themselves?

A poster to a link I provided here a few months ago that comparison tested the Fury, Galaxy and Impala expressed the opinion that the Fury appeared "more innovative in appearance than the other two"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2010, 06:20 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
mopars have always had respect, but their sales have generally been below that of gm and ford. as for amc, they have always been a niche manufacturer, and the reason their sales have been low is because of their truly spotty quality control, and their penchant for buy parts on sale and making them work. for instance in the late 60 and early 70's if you bought a jeep wagoneer with the 360 V8, you would get one of three engines, the amc 360, the ford FE360, or the buick 350. all good engines, but amc did not have the manufacturing capacity to make enough engines to cover the demand, so they bought what engines were the cheapest available that week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2010, 11:18 PM
 
Location: Northeast Tennessee
7,305 posts, read 28,231,171 times
Reputation: 5523
I would say Mopar would be closer to GM and Ford back then... you seemed to always hear the "big 3" back then and Mopar was #3 I believe. GM #1 and Ford #2.... this is how it was for so many years. AMC just seemed to hang onto their shirt tails... even hanging onto Mopars tails. AMC used alot of parts from other makes anyway. lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlrl View Post
It seemed that when it came to mid sized and full sized cars in the 72-74 model era, GM and Ford were kind of tied with respect to popularity, whereas there were less fans of say Satellites/Coronets/Furies/Monacos/Polaras/Newports/New Yorkers/Imps and even less fans of Matadors and Ambassadors

And even Consumer reports tests of those cars during the 72-74 model years also paralelled the public's views--GM cars and Ford/Mercury usually were rated ahead of Mopars/AMC's in comparative tests

Do you consider the above mentioned Mopars as being closer to AMC's, or closer to GM/Ford, or in a class by themselves?

A poster to a link I provided here a few months ago that comparison tested the Fury, Galaxy and Impala expressed the opinion that the Fury appeared "more innovative in appearance than the other two"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 06:13 AM
 
1,290 posts, read 2,569,789 times
Reputation: 686
AMC-The Original Hybrid
I thought that AMC didn't start building the Jeep brand until 72 or 74? Wasn't it Willy's in the 50s, then Kaiser, and then AMC around 73? I thought it unfortunate for AMC to be sold to Mopar in 79....Jeep just wasn't the same after that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 06:57 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,689,401 times
Reputation: 3868
Default was there a

New Yorker for Chrysler in 1979? If there was, was it based on the Aspen chassis (ie Diplomat,LeBaron et al) or on the new Newport/St Regis chassis? I remember a Town and Country station wagon (I have a 79 model in scale model) which was essentially a New Yorker wagon but now I can't recall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 08:00 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electron View Post
AMC-The Original Hybrid
I thought that AMC didn't start building the Jeep brand until 72 or 74? Wasn't it Willy's in the 50s, then Kaiser, and then AMC around 73? I thought it unfortunate for AMC to be sold to Mopar in 79....Jeep just wasn't the same after that.
amc bought jeep in the 60's when willys was going under.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Northeast Tennessee
7,305 posts, read 28,231,171 times
Reputation: 5523
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
amc bought jeep in the 60's when willys was going under.

yeah and didnt Mopar purchase them in 1987 or 1988? I think it was 1987, but I could be wrong. I know that 1987 was the last year for cars like the AMC Eagle wagon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Northeast Tennessee
7,305 posts, read 28,231,171 times
Reputation: 5523
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlrl View Post
New Yorker for Chrysler in 1979? If there was, was it based on the Aspen chassis (ie Diplomat,LeBaron et al) or on the new Newport/St Regis chassis? I remember a Town and Country station wagon (I have a 79 model in scale model) which was essentially a New Yorker wagon but now I can't recall.
Yep, they did..... it was based on the Newport/St. Regis chassis.... (it was Mopars largest sedan that year, so I guess it was the closest competitor to the Cadillac DeVille and Lincoln Town Car....


http://www.lov2xlr8.no/brochures/mopar/79yorker.html

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,782,378 times
Reputation: 2274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennesseestorm View Post
yeah and didnt Mopar purchase them in 1987 or 1988? I think it was 1987, but I could be wrong. I know that 1987 was the last year for cars like the AMC Eagle wagon.
Yes AMC was bought out by Chrysler in 1987.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2010, 09:14 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennesseestorm View Post
yeah and didnt Mopar purchase them in 1987 or 1988? I think it was 1987, but I could be wrong. I know that 1987 was the last year for cars like the AMC Eagle wagon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deez Nuttz View Post
Yes AMC was bought out by Chrysler in 1987.
yep, and the amc name plate went away and was replaced by the eagle name plate, and eventually that name plate went away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Retired Brands
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top