Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have worked for decades, and for the last 15 or so years, have hit the SS/FICA max contributions. I am now retiring, but my company wants to keep me on as a consultant, and I want the benefits, so I am inclined to take it. I will be an employee (not an independent), paid around $50K/year. I am only 58, and won't start taking SS until probably 70.
Question: Will this lower salary for possibly five or more years affect my SS benefits when I finally take them? IOW, does a lower final salary change the fact I should get the maximum benefit allowed due to hitting the FICA cap for years?
They take the 35 highest years, so it would depend on how many years you had Made the Max or close to it. If you did not have enough HIGH paid years then yes the 50K a year would lower it some. but of course you would also be getting the 8% a year increase in benefit for each year over FRA you work too.
If you have 35 years at the maximum-social-security-contribution-amount salary then having a lower salary won't affect your earnings
If you don't have 35 years at the maximum-social-security-contribution-amount salary and don't continue working at all, $0 will be factored in to the average for each year that you don't have a salary and you would have a lower SS Benefit than if you earned $50K in those years.
If you don't have 35 years at the maximum-social-security-contribution-amount salary and in the beginning of your work history you had a salary that when adjusted for inflation would have been less than $50K today, the current $50K salary will replace those earlier smaller salaries and will increase your SS benefit.
Thanks, makes sense. I need to pull one of my SS statements and see how much I made back in the stone age.
Remember that they index those wages for inflation before applying the formulas to determine your benefits. If that is reflected in the statement, great. If not, just be aware of it. It's been so long since I received a statement from SS that I don't even remember what they look like.
Remember that they index those wages for inflation before applying the formulas to determine your benefits. If that is reflected in the statement, great. If not, just be aware of it. It's been so long since I received a statement from SS that I don't even remember what they look like.
The Statements show actual dollars at the time (year) of earnings. I did a spreadsheet analysis of my own, using the inflation adjustment factors that SSA uses (from 0 to almost 9%). I found that a few of my earliest years (1963-1964) (31st & 32nd highest) where I earned over the max for those years ($4800 ) ($1.65/hour with lots of OT) were worth more (31st & 32nd highest) than later years (2009) with earnings of $33000 (35th highest).
Thanks, makes sense. I need to pull one of my SS statements and see how much I made back in the stone age.
Can be surprising if you look back.
Most of 1968 and all of 69 were army years. 1969 is a little misleading, I was getting $300 per month but for most of that time I was in Vietnam where I don't think I paid any taxes. I do know combat pay was tax exempt but apparently they did make me pay on my base pay.
From 1970 to 1976 I kicked around doing what I wanted to do which was flying. In 77 I got married, change careers and got serious with life. Having a wife and child to support will do that to some men.
For me the 1980's got really good to the point where I always maxed out on social security about mid summer. Always like a pay raise.
The inflation years.
I wasn't as poor as I looked. Adjusting for inflation $4,759 in 1970 would be equivalent to $29,022.99 today.
Adjusting for inflation $19,900 in 1980 would be equivalent to $57,254.04 today. Think about that in comparison to doday's world, a 32 years old high school graduate earning close to $27.50/hr and the company paid 100% of my medical benefits.
I have worked for decades, and for the last 15 or so years, have hit the SS/FICA max contributions. I am now retiring, but my company wants to keep me on as a consultant, and I want the benefits, so I am inclined to take it. I will be an employee (not an independent), paid around $50K/year. I am only 58, and won't start taking SS until probably 70.
Question: Will this lower salary for possibly five or more years affect my SS benefits when I finally take them? IOW, does a lower final salary change the fact I should get the maximum benefit allowed due to hitting the FICA cap for years?
Thanks.
If you have not hit the maximum contributions for at least 35 of your earning years, you will not receive the maximum benefit.
The Social Security "estimates" are based on the underlying assumption that you will continue to earn the same annual wage as your most recently reported wage. As others have noted, Social Security indexes your wages (but only through age 59) and it is still likely that your $50,000 salary will replace a few of your years of lower earnings. Social Security Benefit Amounts
You indicate the alternative to accepting the employer's offer is retirement. If that is your only concern, then it is likely that accepting the lower wage will not reduce your benefit COMPARED to retiring. However, accepting the offer COMPARED to continuing to work at the higher income will reduce your benefit.
As noted elsewhere, you can play around with Social Security's calculator to get a better picture of how your choices will impact your final benefit.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.