Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2014, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beach Sportsfan View Post
Florida is 1.6 and you must reach 62 That's why I said I would have gladly contributed your % to get that 2.4.
So right now we are putting 3% which is not helping the pension as originally stipulated and after 30 years I will get 48% for pension
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
NJ is 1.8 and the employee contributes 7.5%
I completely understand where you folks are coming from. Those percentages are really quite low, and indeed I am grateful and thankful for my 2.4%. In Louisiana it's 2.5%, unless they have lowered it in recent years. Again, there is considerable variation among the states. By the way, for a long time the California maximum percent for teachers was 2.0%, then about 15 years ago (give or take, as that's a guess on my part) the legislature raised it to 2.4%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2014, 04:07 PM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,627,203 times
Reputation: 1789
Escort I am not critical that was part of your compensation packet. NJ now has a formula of 1.67 and contribute 7.5% for the new tier employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 04:55 PM
 
3,930 posts, read 2,098,635 times
Reputation: 4580
In Florida I'm worried because some legislators have been pushing for all new hires to go into the 401k route and not the pension but of course if all the new hires goes into those individual plans how will the state continue to pay those still in the pension fund. I think it's a way for them to eventually cry they are bankrupt and not pay it at the assigned rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 05:20 PM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,627,203 times
Reputation: 1789
In the devastating Detroit bankruptcy the pensions were cut 4.5%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
In the devastating Detroit bankruptcy the pensions were cut 4.5%.
Good point. While that must be tough on Detroit retirees, I was surprised the cut was not even greater.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 08:18 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,045,989 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Good point. While that must be tough on Detroit retirees, I was surprised the cut was not even greater.
That's the cut for now. It makes assumptions about future solvency that may or may not pan out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2014, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
That's the cut for now. It makes assumptions about future solvency that may or may not pan out.
A really important point that the Stockton retirees must be concerned about right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2014, 11:39 AM
mlb
 
Location: North Monterey County
4,971 posts, read 4,452,471 times
Reputation: 7903
20 Best & Worst States for Pension Funding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2014, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlb View Post
Thanks for the link, mlb. I found it interesting. Not only are the 10 best funded pension states and the 10 worst funded pension states given, but the percent of funding is listed, which ranges from 99.9% (Wisconsin, the best state) to 43.4% (Illinois, the worst state). In a sense, Illinois is even worse off than its last place ranking would indicate, because the second worst state (Kentucky) is funded at 53.4%, ten whole percentage points better than Illinois! Illinois is in a league of its own!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2014, 06:15 PM
mlb
 
Location: North Monterey County
4,971 posts, read 4,452,471 times
Reputation: 7903
Adjusted Pension Liability Medians for U.S. States:

http://www.ncsl.org/documents/summit...ty-Medians.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top