Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2015, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
How is this different from SS? It technically a 2.5 tax in addition to 6.75%(or close) to SS, for self employed people, it would be 5% tax on top of 13% tax rate. I have a self employed kid, this would be 18% tax on top of everything else they have to play.
SS is an insurance plan, with a weighted return favoring lower earners. This is a pension plan where the contributions basically become an annuity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2015, 05:44 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,065,647 times
Reputation: 3884
Generations often start off slow in wealth building. Seems it is somewhat, if not completely the nature of the beast. This generation's - Millenial - slow start is exacerbated by the 2008 meltdown, slow job growth bounce back, particularly of quality jobs, misfit of skills to quality employment, the immigration mess and outlandish student debt. I say outlandish because a lot of the student debt is not smart debt; wrong education, lifestyle enhanced (whatever happened to the poor student).

Not a great hand dealt, but not insurmountable. Solution is simple but not easy. Roll up the shirt sleeves and get to work. Work meaning work, paying down debt, retooling, modest living. The answer is in the mirror, every day. I do not think yet another government controlled, instituted, behavior controlling program is the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 06:00 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,763,707 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
SS is an insurance plan, with a weighted return favoring lower earners. This is a pension plan where the contributions basically become an annuity.
For a while until they change the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 11:55 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
...which is why Dr Ghilarducci included a provision for a tax credit as part of her comprehensive pension reform proposal:

The Guaranteed Retirement Account (GRA) proposal mandates a contribution of five percent of earnings for all workers – evenly divided between an employer contribution of 2.5 percent and a participant contribution of 2.5 percent. Under the GRA the federal government through the Social Security Administration would administer the plan and the Thrift Savings Plan would manage the pooled assets. Contributions to Guaranteed Retirement Accounts would be deducted from payroll. The 2.5 percent employee contributions would be offset by a $600 refundable tax credit provided to all participants.


I was all set to say she should go back to making chocolates but she has successfully bought me off!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,081 posts, read 31,313,313 times
Reputation: 47551
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Generations often start off slow in wealth building. Seems it is somewhat, if not completely the nature of the beast. This generation's - Millenial - slow start is exacerbated by the 2008 meltdown, slow job growth bounce back, particularly of quality jobs, misfit of skills to quality employment, the immigration mess and outlandish student debt. I say outlandish because a lot of the student debt is not smart debt; wrong education, lifestyle enhanced (whatever happened to the poor student).

Not a great hand dealt, but not insurmountable. Solution is simple but not easy. Roll up the shirt sleeves and get to work. Work meaning work, paying down debt, retooling, modest living. The answer is in the mirror, every day. I do not think yet another government controlled, instituted, behavior controlling program is the answer.
I hear about the "lifestyle debt" of students and maybe it's because I'm a little older, but I never really saw that in college five to ten years ago.Most everyone I knew drove average, older cars. Not junkers, but nothing fancy. I don't know anyone who was living lavishly, even if someone was, it was probably off mommy and daddy's dime, not through a loan. I'm sure you'll find a few idiots doing what you say, but the number of those folks is by no means significant enough to make a generalization.

I was in the bad off boat a couple years back and I worked much, much harder at my low paying call center jobs than I do now. It wasn't about "rolling up my sleeves" and getting to work - I was working. I had a decent major in college (economics), internship related to major (local brokerage), and had worked regular jobs, and still fell flat on my face.

I don't think more government is the answer either, but simple bootstrapping doesn't really do justice to the problems Millenials face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2015, 08:02 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,920,976 times
Reputation: 8743
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
How is this different from SS? It technically a 2.5 tax in addition to 6.75%(or close) to SS, for self employed people, it would be 5% tax on top of 13% tax rate. I have a self employed kid, this would be 18% tax on top of everything else they have to play.
With the Ghirarducci plan, the additional 5% would go into a private account with your name on it, earning interest. It is just a mandatory savings or investment account.

With Social Security, your contribution goes into a pool and when you retire, what you get back is determined by a complex formula that redistributes income in favor of those who paid in less.

The two systems are really quite different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 03:48 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,763,707 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Siegel View Post
With the Ghirarducci plan, the additional 5% would go into a private account with your name on it, earning interest. It is just a mandatory savings or investment account.

With Social Security, your contribution goes into a pool and when you retire, what you get back is determined by a complex formula that redistributes income in favor of those who paid in less.

The two systems are really quite different.
The trick is what age do they let you take the private pension out. 55 if not then it could be worthless, because SS kicks in at 62, unless they are raising this age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 04:02 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,045,989 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
The trick is what age do they let you take the private pension out. 55 if not then it could be worthless, because SS kicks in at 62, unless they are raising this age.
The other problem is if you die only half of the balance goes to your estate. The balance stays in the pool for others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 04:05 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,763,707 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
The other problem is if you die only half of the balance goes to your estate. The balance stays in the pool for others.
It sounds like a bad idea all around, kind of like myIRA. I think they are afraid to tell people the truth, SS is broke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 04:14 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,639,632 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
The other problem is if you die only half of the balance goes to your estate. The balance stays in the pool for others.
But the other half was money your employer matched, not money you contributed, correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top