Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I just spent $16 on a cheeseburger. My MBA and 35 years in the investment business didn't prepare me for that.
If you don't have a mortgage and no longer need to save out of your income, a 70% replacement ratio should be fine IF you have excellent health insurance and no sick parents, kids, or other dependents. Otherwise, the sky's the limit. Emergencies tend to come out of nowhere and accelerate as you get older.
Yes I said parents. My mom was 77 when she stopped having to take care of her father.
OP - you're smart to be planning now and putting away so much money. However, life happens and you may not be at the same job in 10 years or you may be divorced, have (more) kids, etc. Build in some flexibility. 25 years is a long time!
Also, I don't understand so many retiree's fear of taking any money out of their accounts. They want to live off dividends and interest. They've saved maybe a million plus dollars and even though MWR is often estimated as 4% a year to be safe, they won't even take 1% out of FEAR.
Think! If you are willing to seriously curtail your quality of life to save that much money and then you don't even spend (the bulk of it) after you are retired then I don't know what you're (that's a universal "you're") doing it all for. Think about what you want your retirement to be and what you are willing to give up for it when you're working to achieve that. Try to make it a balance.
I've always wondered this same thing. People have a million, and seem to want to die with a million and live off the interest. Makes no sense at all. Guess there is a fear of living to 100.
they better have a very low withdrawal rate to not touch principal . seems a shame to leave so much unspent .
in order to have the principal remain untouched you have to hold to a 2% draw inflation adjusted or less . drawing 4% inflation adjusted assumes principal can fall to zero by the 30th year if the sequence of gains and losses is poor .
If you don't have a mortgage and no longer need to save out of your income, a 70% replacement ratio should be fine IF you have excellent health insurance and no sick parents, kids, or other dependents.
No offense but I find the any advice given to everyone that a certain number (70% is commonly thrown about) is a good target for post-retirement income needs fairly worthless advice.
i would never advise anyone based on what income was either . only off what expenses will be and the lifestyle you want .
i couldn't do much basing our retirement on just 70-80% of what our income was . many expenses like health insurance are soaring compared to what we paid while working .
the most costliest expense we now have next to healthcare and rent is time .
Yeah I agree with that. But what drives me nuts is when people act as if $50,000/year in retirement is the same as a $50,000 salary. It's obviously not. That salary included tons of deductions including Social Security and 401(k) contributions. Taxes are generally higher on income too.
No offense but I find the any advice given to everyone that a certain number (70% is commonly thrown about) is a good target for post-retirement income needs fairly worthless advice.
There are far too many variables.
It is usually somewhat difficult to do long term planning or probabilbly or really any planning without a target. That being said there are ongoing efforts to help the uncertain determine what is probably a safe/working target for them. Others are fortunate to have the reference base to craft their own targets/goals and create a plan on their own to reach it. Flying blind into retirement is oh well .........
Yeah I agree with that. But what drives me nuts is when people act as if $50,000/year in retirement is the same as a $50,000 salary. It's obviously not. That salary included tons of deductions including Social Security and 401(k) contributions. Taxes are generally higher on income too.
As MathJak notes for many costs related to benefits while working can soar when needing to be self provided in retirement.
It is usually somewhat difficult to do long term planning or probabilbly or really any planning without a target. That being said there are ongoing efforts to help the uncertain determine what is probably a safe/working target for them. Others are fortunate to have the reference base to craft their own targets/goals and create a plan on their own to reach it. Flying blind into retirement is oh well .........
It depends on when you start. In my case, the best I could do is add as much wealth as possible in my last 15 work years. My target has nothing to do with percent of income replacement. It's simply how much I can set aside per year until I retire without completely disrupting my life. I have a plan and I hope to execute it for the next 7 3/4 years. If life happens and I fall short, I replan. I'm going to have a roof over my head and I'm not going to starve if I quit working today but that is not the retiree lifestyle I desire.
I am thinking that perhaps 60% income replacement will be comfortable for us in retirement. I keep reading 80% but we are generally frugal people (no luxury car or country club membership). We are happy with a simple life and a few nice things once in a while.
Only you can determine the number. The standard 80% advice is nearly worthless, in my opinion.
The big wildcards on the upside are (1) medical/dental, and (2) what will you be doing with your time and how much will it cost.
The obvious areas of savings have mostly been mentioned, I believe. The no car payment thing may be a bit optimistic, but of course this depends greatly on personal circumstances.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.