Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2015, 09:08 PM
 
168 posts, read 174,602 times
Reputation: 844

Advertisements

Pension fund may cut benefits for 273,000 workers and retirees - Oct. 7, 2015

if your pension is paid out by a multi employer fund you may be interested in this article. Last December a law was passed.allowing these funds to cut existing pensions if they face insolvency within 10 to 20 years. Apparently this is become more prevalent at large companies such as UPS pull out of these funds for future employees. This puts already retired past employees at risk of having their current pensions reduced.

I think this makes a case for taking a lump sum payout and investing it yourself if that option is available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:17 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798
Even eight years ago, when I was offered a lump sum for a small pension I had, I thought that was such a significant risk that I chose the lump sum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:37 AM
 
Location: Central IL
20,722 posts, read 16,381,989 times
Reputation: 50380
So how is it decided that a company is facing insolvency in 10-20 years? Seems that is very subjective and how many companies would love to use that as a way to get out from under the burden of pensions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 05:44 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by reneeh63 View Post
So how is it decided that a company is facing insolvency in 10-20 years? Seems that is very subjective...
While I'm not well-versed enough in actuarial science to explain how, it is assuredly not subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 06:36 AM
 
Location: MMU->ABE->ATL->ASH
9,317 posts, read 21,010,260 times
Reputation: 10443
Quote:
Originally Posted by reneeh63 View Post
So how is it decided that a company is facing insolvency in 10-20 years? Seems that is very subjective and how many companies would love to use that as a way to get out from under the burden of pensions?
Central States Pension Fund is not a Company Pension Fund. Its UNION fund, Part of the union contracts is the companies that have union workers Contribute $'s per hour worked for the Union Fund. The Union Runs and manages the Fund.

The "Idea" was so Union Member could go from company to company in a union job and keep there pension.

But the Fund is alot like Social Security , Its a ponzi scheme, They need current member putting money in to fund the current pension costs, When the fund was in doing well they had 4 Paying Member for each Retiree, Now it 5 retiree for each paying member.

Last edited by flyonpa; 11-02-2015 at 07:02 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 08:30 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,225,683 times
Reputation: 57822
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyonpa View Post
Central States Pension Fund is not a Company Pension Fund. Its UNION fund, Part of the union contracts is the companies that have union workers Contribute $'s per hour worked for the Union Fund. The Union Runs and manages the Fund.

The "Idea" was so Union Member could go from company to company in a union job and keep there pension.

But the Fund is alot like Social Security , Its a ponzi scheme, They need current member putting money in to fund the current pension costs, When the fund was in doing well they had 4 Paying Member for each Retiree, Now it 5 retiree for each paying member.
And unlike the federal government, union pension plans don't have the ability to print money or take funds from other programs to cover a shortfall. With the big reduction in union membership, it's easy to see how the funds will run out in 10 years, especially since that coincides with the biggest wave of boomer retirements.

Membership Rate Falls for U.S. Unions in 2014 - WSJ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 01:47 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,275,306 times
Reputation: 40260
I'll happily support bailing out union pension funds if the Federal Government will guarantee the return on my 401(k).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suevee View Post
I think this makes a case for taking a lump sum payout and investing it yourself if that option is available.
The cuts only average 23%. It's not like they're going to be below poverty level or anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 04:34 PM
 
168 posts, read 174,602 times
Reputation: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
The cuts only average 23%. It's not like they're going to be below poverty level or anything.
So if your pension is $2000 now you will receive a new pension of $1540. Big drop especially with inflation. It really makes a case for investing a lump sum payout. At least you have some control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2015, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Thank your government. Congress made the change to multi employer pensions where current recipients of pension money could face cuts.

It got passed end of 2014 as part of a spending bill. It set a precedent folks and hardly anyone knew it happened.
Only those 80 and older won't see cuts. Union members get no say so in how much is cut.
And there is no requirement to restore the lost benefits.

I recall this was brought up here in the Retirement forum back when it got passed.
If Congress can do this to union pensions then they can certainly do the same to Social Security.

Here's the amendment:
http://edworkforce.house.gov/uploade...ion_reform.pdf

Here's a summary (plain English )
http://www.pensionrights.org/issues/...s-spending-law
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top