Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2017, 10:59 AM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,083,094 times
Reputation: 6655

Advertisements

Of course Matts numbers all assume no pensions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2017, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,759 posts, read 5,058,954 times
Reputation: 9214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryinva View Post
Exactly! If a two earner couple with very high SS delays filing to 70, then just SS is almost $80k today. So one could easily have $20k in LTCGs or dividends, and pay no or very little tax. But the instant the extra income makes SS taxable (as 50% of SS is included in calculating AGI when there is other income), then taxes easily jump to 25% bracket at that level.
Well, I looked at two scenarios for age 65 couple.

(1) $50K SS and $50K LTCG ($100K total)
(2) $80K SS and $30K LTCG ($110K total)

Both of these couples have enough income that they pay a small amount (less than $1000) in federal income tax. Both are paying an effective marginal rate of 8.5% on their LTCG, because of the way SS and LTCG interact.

Now, they are both close to the point of LTCG being taxed outright, at which point they may see an effective LTCG rate of 15+8.5 = 23.5%. Then once they are past the "torpedo" situation they are back down to 15% for quite a long while.

It's a bit messy, obviously, and I think difficult to make sweeping generalizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 12:42 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,083,094 times
Reputation: 6655
That's what I also have calculated. Once you get above $120/30k then the torpedo is done and over and effective rate just steadily climbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 12:49 PM
 
7,654 posts, read 5,116,882 times
Reputation: 5036
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
maybe , maybe not .
rents are set by markets . markets don't care if you have a mortgage and your neighbors apartment for rent does not .

many locations in the country rent for less than costs, especially early on with new landlords who just bought . .
Thats when forclosures are right around the corner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,759 posts, read 5,058,954 times
Reputation: 9214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryinva View Post
That's what I also have calculated. Once you get above $120/30k then the torpedo is done and over and effective rate just steadily climbs.

Well, yes, then we're back to the rates we are used to seeing without SS in the picture. For LTCG it's 15% federal until one hits the Medicare surtax of 3.8% ($250K AGI for joint return) so we have 18.8%. The next bump up, to 23.8% total, is over $450K AGI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 02:45 PM
 
106,677 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
we had a very high income in 2014 when we sold some commercial lease rights . we had a 20% capital gains rate plus , a 3.80% surcharge , the surcharge is not included in the 20% rate , it is on top of it . the gain now threw the entire rest of our income on to the amt tax system . .

the penalty was 16k additional in just amt over and above what we would have paid under the regular tax system . .

but it got worse , now we paid in a boatload of state taxes from the sale . the big state tax deduction the following year nailed us again with the amt tax even on our normal income .

the first year it got us on income , the 2nd year it got us on deductions .

but wait we are not done .

2 years later my wife went on medicare . they used 2014 income in 2016 to set her rate .

she got a 300 a month increase , if i was on medicare it would have been a 600 a month increase .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,759 posts, read 5,058,954 times
Reputation: 9214
^^


Yeah. Still waiting on that simplified tax code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 02:56 PM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,287,859 times
Reputation: 25502
Quote:
Originally Posted by selhars View Post
Thanks so much math, for that reminder. you've got me thinking again.

I'm 56 (57 next month) -- and left my job in march (RIF) -- so I'm thinking......maybe roll my 401k into a Trad IRA. Then maybe at some point start drawing that down (and just put the money some place else) -- so that -- later -- RMDs don't raise my taxes. I'll have to do the math on that. See how much to start pulling and when. ..... to see if its even worth it. That's a LOT of figuring and projection scenarios.

I've never looked at how much -- or how little -- one has to have before the "tax torpedo" is an issue.


Be careful.

You might want to leave the 401(k) in place until you turn 59.5 ... If you leave the plan after 55, you can make withdrawals after 55 without the 10% penalty. You can't do that from an IRA. That would give you greater flexibility if you should need the money before you hit the 59.5 threshold.

I couldn't do that as I retired at 53.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 03:11 PM
 
10,612 posts, read 12,132,699 times
Reputation: 16779
^^ Already checked that. My plan -- even though the IRS say you can -- doesn't allow for periodic withdrawals. So even though I left my job at age 56. I have to roll it all over to a new job 401K -- or roll it all over to a Trad IRA and lose the PRE-59 ability to tap it. Because it's then in an IRA, I'd be under the IRA rules and once again have to wait to 59 1/2.

Quote:
In general, you want to start drawing down your IRAs soon after age 59.5, and draw as much as possible , while staying in your minimum tax bracket. ( referred to as "topping up the bracket"). And before you start SS benefits.
Aaaah, yes. But if I'm just pulling it out in order to pay lower/less taxes later -- that creates the issue of where to now put that money. I'm taking it out -- just to -- what? reinvest it where? in what? Same funds but now in taxable accounts?? A PART of me think if that's all I'm doing it for just leave it be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 03:20 PM
 
36 posts, read 30,746 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
we had a very high income in 2014 when we sold some commercial lease rights . we had a 20% capital gains rate plus , a 3.80% surcharge , the surcharge is not included in the 20% rate , it is on top of it . the gain now threw the entire rest of our income on to the amt tax system . .

the penalty was 16k additional in just amt over and above what we would have paid under the regular tax system . .

but it got worse , now we paid in a boatload of state taxes from the sale . the big state tax deduction the following year nailed us again with the amt tax even on our normal income .

the first year it got us on income , the 2nd year it got us on deductions .

but wait we are not done .

2 years later my wife went on medicare . they used 2014 income in 2016 to set her rate .

she got a 300 a month increase , if i was on medicare it would have been a 600 a month increase .
Thank you for your contribution
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top