Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2017, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,105,738 times
Reputation: 9334

Advertisements

This is only important to FERS and Military personnel who have used the TSP program for retirement savings. The changes are good and important IMHO. It is gaining momentum and hopefully will be passed soon. The current rules are very restrictive and in some cases impossible to work with. Under my circumstances it works well but could have more flexibility. The changes were proposed by TSP after review and evaluation since people of my age are really in the first wave of retirees drawing on the system.

The Program was initially envisioned as a pension style series of payments. A lot like how I have my withdrawals going. The change will remove anything that is not part of any other 401k system out there. As I said in my case the program is good. I have as much control as I absolutely need but not enough for changes throughout the year. I can make 1 change a year on how much my payments will be for the next calendar year.


House Oversight Members Join Effort to Loosen TSP Withdrawal Restrictions - Pay & Benefits - GovExec.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2017, 06:19 PM
 
2,917 posts, read 2,162,317 times
Reputation: 6990
why is it not important for CSRS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2017, 03:36 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,105,738 times
Reputation: 9334
Quote:
Originally Posted by old fed View Post
why is it not important for CSRS?
Well it is for the very last of the CSRS folks and only those people that decided that in spite of not getting the match they contributed to TSP. A lot of the CSRS folks around me especially those that were closest to retirement didn't contribute. FERS folks though are a hugely different story. Sorry if you felt slighted. TSP is 30+ years old. The change over from CSRS happened all at the same time. They had some crossover of CSRS folks converted, some blended and others just stayed as CSRS. If there are CSRS employees out there they have over 40 years of service now and counting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2017, 08:44 AM
 
2,917 posts, read 2,162,317 times
Reputation: 6990
ok, thanks. i was trying to figure out if i missed something. the article seems to reference retirees as well and how they manage their fund so...

"The TSP Modernization Act, sponsored by Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Mark Meadows, R-N.C., would allow federal employees and retirees enrolled in the Thrift Savings Plan to make multiple age-based withdrawals after leaving government..."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2017, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,105,738 times
Reputation: 9334
Quote:
Originally Posted by old fed View Post
ok, thanks. i was trying to figure out if i missed something. the article seems to reference retirees as well and how they manage their fund so...

"The TSP Modernization Act, sponsored by Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Mark Meadows, R-N.C., would allow federal employees and retirees enrolled in the Thrift Savings Plan to make multiple age-based withdrawals after leaving government..."


The problem is if you haven't got much many decided to take it as they got out. I know a few. The way it is written is if you want to take it out over 10 years you got screwed if all you had in was 200k It wouldn't last you long at I income rate but they said all or nothing. So in one case you have a half mil. That is a nice easy math income cause you have a pension take 3% and it lasts 40 years by the calculator. If you only have 200k you would be lucky to take 700 a month to make it last over the 10 year mark. So if your payments can't stretch that far they had even worse options for you. The entire premise is based on about a 30 year period saving 12% salary invested in some decent index funds and the rules made easy. You take the entire amount in monthly you taking the risk of fluctuations or buying an annuity and letting the insurance take on that risk just so that the entire system was based upon the thinking at the time as a pension system. Time for them to fix that. Oh and one more thing those restrictions even applied post 59 1/2 when all other tax advantaged retirement savings have no such restrictions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top